New stimulation procedures for language mapping in stereo‐EEG

Author:

Abarrategui Belén123ORCID,Pelliccia Veronica2,Giovannelli Ginevra24,Nichelatti Michele5,Valenzano Serena67,Mikulan Ezequiel8,Pigorini Andrea910ORCID,Revay Martina211,Scarpa Pina12,Tassi Laura2

Affiliation:

1. Neurology Department Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Spain

2. Claudio Munari Epilepsy Surgery Center ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milan Italy

3. Istituto di Neuroscienze Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Parma Italy

4. Department of Neurology 2 Careggi University Hospital Florence Italy

5. Service of Biostatistics, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milan Italy

6. Center for Neuroscience University of Camerino Camerino Italy

7. Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco" Università Degli Studi di Milano Milan Italy

8. Department of Health Sciences Università Degli Studi di Milano Milan Italy

9. Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences University of Milan Milan Italy

10. UOC Maxillo‐facial Surgery and Dentistry, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Milan Italy

11. Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Neuroscience University of Parma Parma Italy

12. Department of Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuropsychology Centre ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda Milan Italy

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveCortical intracerebral electrical stimulation is an important tool for language mapping in the presurgical work‐up of patients with drug‐resistant focal epilepsy. Language mapping with stereo–electroencephalography (EEG) is usually performed by high‐frequency stimulations (HFS: 50 Hz), whereas low‐frequency stimulations (LFS: 1 Hz) are usually considered useful for primary cortices mapping. Little is known in literature about “intermediate” frequencies (IFS: 6–15 Hz). Our objective is to explore the clinical usefulness of IFS in language mapping and identify factors, beyond the electrical parameters, that impact the mapping.MethodsWe studied 23 patients submitted to stereo‐EEG for presurgical evaluation. Language mapping was performed in the anterior, posterior and/or basal language region of the dominant hemisphere for language. We included all contact positions within these regions stimulated by HFS (50 Hz, 5 s, 1–3 mA) and IFS (6‐15 Hz, 15 s, 5 mA). We compared the capability of both stimulation methods to induce a language deficit without afterdischarges (ADs), and we analyzed factors related to clinical examination, region, and stimulation technique by multivariate analysis.ResultsA total of 211 stimulations (98 HFS, 113 IFS) in 70 cortical sites within the anterior (84 stimulations), posterior (137), and basal language region (60) were included. IFS induced more frequently language deficits not associated to AD compared to HFS (37.1% vs 25.7%, p = .0043), whereas HFS provoked more diffuse AD (34.7% vs 15.0%, p = .001). Investigating multiple language functions increased the probability of revealing a deficit (odds ratio [OR] 3.16, p = .0016), independently of the stimulation method.SignificanceIFS are valuable for language mapping, thereby improving the probability of inducing a clinical deficit not accompanied by an AD. The completeness of the clinical examination independently affects the sensitivity of the mapping. IFS are a new tool with potential usefulness for the cortical mapping of other associative cortical regions.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3