Towards new perspectives: A scoping review and meta‐synthesis to redefine brain health for multiple sclerosis

Abstract

AbstractBackground and purposeResearch promoting the health of the brain has increased exponentially over the last decade. The importance of ‘brain health’ for multiple sclerosis (MS), as one example, is a high priority. However, as research into the concept increases, so does varied use of the term.MethodsA scoping review, guided by the methodological framework of the Joanna Briggs Institute, was conducted to collate the evidence relating to brain health for MS. A comprehensive literature search incorporated six search strategies to retrieve both scientific and grey literature sources. All evidence sources were qualitatively charted and synthesized (meta‐synthesis) according to their definition of brain health used, outcome measures and brain‐healthy lifestyle elements.ResultsSeventy evidence sources (34 peer reviewed, 36 grey literature) were eligible for inclusion. Of these, just over half (n = 40, 57%) provided a definition of brain health. The most common definition alluded to the biomedical model of neurological reserve (n = 22, 55%), a self‐remodelling theory described to retain optimal brain function. Twenty‐nine outcome measures of brain health were identified, the most frequent being magnetic resonance imaging metrics (n = 25, 83%). Physical activity was the most prevalent brain‐healthy lifestyle element (n = 44), followed by avoidance of smoking (n = 26) and diet (n = 24).ConclusionsBrain health should be considered a primary target for optimal disease and lifestyle management across the MS disease course. A working definition reflecting a shift from a medical lens towards broader biopsychosocial contexts that may influence brain health for people living with MS is proposed.