Morbidity following robot‐assisted surgery in a gynecological oncology setting: A cohort study

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe objective of the study was to provide a comprehensive description of perioperative morbidity associated with robot‐assisted surgery (RAS) in a gynecological oncology setting in order to improve the preoperative counseling of women and support shared decision‐making.Material and MethodsAll women scheduled for intended RAS between January 2015 and December 2022 were prospectively included in an electronic morbidity database for the analyses of perioperative complications.ResultsIn total, 2225 women were included. Sixty‐four patients (2.9%) experienced an intraoperative complication. Intraoperative complications were associated with a higher rate of conversion to laparotomy (15.6% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of major postoperative morbidity (9.3% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (9.3% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), compared to cases without intraoperative complications. Thirty‐day postoperative morbidity was evaluated according to the Memorial Sloan‐Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System. Grade 3–5 events were considered major. A total of 57 patients (2.6%) experienced a major event after surgery, postoperative rupture of the vaginal vault being the most common complication requiring surgical intervention. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 49 cases (2.2%) and was associated with higher intraoperative blood loss (300 mL vs. 25 mL, p < 0.001), a higher rate of postoperative major events (20.4% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (11.8% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsOur study demonstrates low rates of major perioperative morbidity and conversion to laparotomy after RAS performed by trained high‐volume surgeons in a gynecological oncology setting.