Affiliation:
1. Division Akershus University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo Norway
2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Akershus University Hospital Lørenskog Norway
3. Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
4. Department of Women's Health Karolinska University Hospital Stockholm Sweden
5. Institute of Clinical Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway
6. Health Services Research Unit Akershus University Hospital Lørenskog Norway
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionSecond‐degree perineal tears following vaginal birth are common and presumed to be of little clinical importance. However, the extent of damage to the perineal body varies widely, and there is reason to believe that larger second‐degree tears may be associated with more pelvic floor symptoms, compared to lesser form. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess differences in pelvic floor symptoms according to the severity of second‐degree perineal tears up to 12 months post‐partum, stratified by parity.Material and MethodsThis was a prospective cohort study conducted at Akershus University Hospital, a tertiary referral hospital in Norway. The study sample consisted of 409 primiparas and 394 multiparas with vaginal births. Perineal tears were classified using the classification system recommended by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Further, second‐degree tears were subclassified as 2A, 2B, or 2C, depending on the percentage of damage to the perineal body. Episiotomies were analyzed as a separate group. Pelvic floor symptoms were assessed using the Karolinska Symptoms After Perineal Tear Inventory (KAPTAIN). A linear mixed model was estimated to assess the trend in pelvic floor symptom scores according to perineal tear category and stratified by parity. The primary and secondary outcome measures were the mean sum scores of the KAPTAIN‐Inventory, measured in pregnancy (at 18 weeks of gestation), at 3‐ and 12 months post‐partum, and the reported impact of genital discomfort on quality of life measured in pregnancy and at 12 months post‐partum.ResultsThere were no significant differences in pelvic floor symptom scores over time, or at any timepoint, between no tear, first‐degree tear, or second‐degree tear subcategories, for primi‐, and multiparas. Pelvic floor symptoms increased from pregnancy to 3 months post‐partum and remained higher at 12 months post‐partum compared to pregnancy in all perineal tear categories. Compared to primiparas, multiparas reported a significantly higher impact of genital discomfort on quality of life in pregnancy and at 12 months post‐partum.ConclusionsThere were no statistically significant differences in pelvic floor symptoms according to the severity of second‐degree perineal tears.
Funder
Helse Sør-Øst RHF
Akershus Universitetssykehus