Are expectations of labour and birth fulfilled? A qualitative investigation of first‐time parents

Author:

Colciago Elisabetta1ORCID,Robinson Ann2,Ornaghi Sara13,Fumagalli Simona13ORCID,Antolini Laura1,Nespoli Antonella13,Brown Anna Maria2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano—Bicocca Monza Italy

2. Division of Midwifery University of Surrey—School of Health and Medical Sciences Guildford Surrey UK

3. Department of Obstetrics Foundation IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori Monza Italy

Abstract

AbstractAimTo describe if first‐time parents' expectations of labour and birth, explored during the third trimester of pregnancy, were fulfilled or not when investigated 1 year following birth.DesignQualitative Husserlian phenomenological approach.MethodsThe sample comprises 10 parents (five couples), who participated in an online semi‐structured audio‐recorded individual interview conducted 1 year after birth, between September 2020 and October 2020. Parents' expectations of labour and birth, described throughout a focus group discussion on pregnancy, were compared with their experience explored 1 year after birth. A thematic analysis was adopted and member checking was used to validate participants' thoughts.ResultsParticipants gave birth in a II level maternity unit and one‐to‐one midwifery care was provided. Although during the focus group conducted in pregnancy, women reported being aware of the unpredictable nature of childbirth, they expressed sadness and failure after experiencing some unexpected interventions. The midwife was a reassuring guide, as expected; however, sometimes, the communication was not effective, and women perceived lack of support. Some women partly blame themselves for not being prepared to manage labour pain, which hurt more than expected. Feeling of uncertainty about events were experienced in relation to seeking care at an early stage of labour, which confirmed the fears expressed during pregnancy. During the antenatal focus group discussion, fathers doubted they could be helpful for the labouring women. This negative emotion was confirmed after birth. However, they understood the importance to be present and to support their partner.ConclusionsOne year after birth, participants had consistent memories of their birth experience. Professionals might identify fundamental components of quality maternity care that are meaningful for parents, with the potential to generate a long‐term positive health impact on them. Respectful maternity care should be ensured through a family‐centred approach, with the aim to promote satisfaction.Implications for the Profession and/or Patient CareThe study highlights the importance of taking parents' expectations into account when providing antenatal care to tailor individualized support that addresses their distinct needs and preferences. Healthcare professionals might consider initiating a post‐natal discussion with parents to assess whether their needs and perspectives have been addressed. This perspective may present valuable insights to achieve long‐term positive outcomes, provide high‐quality maternity care, address issues and make improvements.ImpactThe study showed that 1 year after birth, parents can accurately recall their birth. They might also give significant insights into fundamental components of care that they value as crucial to shape a positive birthing experience. Professionals should use this information to build solutions, promoting long‐term well‐being for parents. Respectful interactions and trusting relationships emerged as key elements in parents' experience. A midwifery care focused on parents' needs may contribute to the achievement of positive birth memories.Reporting MethodThis study used the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist.Patient or Public ContributionNo patient or public contribution.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3