The consistency principle: Crisis perceptions, partisanship and public support for democratic norms in comparative perspective

Author:

DRISCOLL AMANDA1ORCID,KREHBIEL JAY2ORCID,NELSON MICHAEL J.3ORCID,KIM SANGYEON4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Political Science Florida State University USA

2. Department of Political Science West Virginia University USA

3. Department of Political Science Pennsylvania State University USA

4. Observatory on Social Media and the Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering Indiana University USA

Abstract

AbstractA growing body of research theorizes that partisanship can undermine democracy as citizens prioritize their political interests over abstract norms and values. We argue that crises might counteract intense partisanship by giving citizens clarity on the threats posed by rule of law violations. Examining the differential application of a law – a breach of democratic norms – we draw on an experiment embedded in representative surveys of Germany, the United States, Hungary and Poland to examine citizens’ sense of appropriate punishment for elites’ violation of a municipal mask‐wearing ordinance. We find evidence of partisan bias in citizens’ willingness to support punishment in all four countries. But, in the two consolidated democracies, we find that concern about the Covid‐19 crisis diminishes partisan biases in punishment preferences: citizens who are most concerned about the crisis also model the most consistency in their willingness to hold copartisans into account.

Funder

National Science Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference37 articles.

1. Anderson K. B.(2022 14 February).Consequences for leaders who break their own pandemic rules.Arab News.https://www.arabnews.com/node/2024706

2. Turning a Blind Eye

3. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times

4. Partisanship, information, and perceptions of government corruption;Blais A.;International Journal of Public Opinion Research,2017

5. Political Competition, Partisanship and Interpersonal Trust in Electoral Democracies

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3