Affiliation:
1. Laboratory of Immunobiology and Immunogenetics Department of Genetics, Postgraduate Program in Genetics and Molecular Biology (PPGBM) Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
2. Postgraduate Program in Gastroenterology and Hepatology Sciences Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
3. Division of Rheumatology Department of Internal Medicine Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) Porto Alegre Rio Grande do Sul Brazil
4. Center for Immuno‐Oncology Center for Cancer Research National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland USA
Abstract
AbstractThis study investigated the impacts of CCR5 promoter region polymorphisms on the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by comparing CCR5 genotypes and haplotypes from SLE patients with ethnically matched controls. A total of 382 SLE patients (289 European‐derived and 93 African‐derived) and 375 controls (243 European‐derived and 132 African‐derived) were genotyped for the CCR2‐64I G > A (rs1799864), CCR5‐59353 C > T (rs1799988), CCR5‐59356 C > T (rs41469351), CCR5‐59402 A > G (rs1800023) and CCR5‐59653 C > T (rs1800024) polymorphisms through polymerase chain reaction‐restriction fragment length polymorphism and direct sequencing. Previous data from CCR5Δ32 analysis was included in the study to infer the CCR5 haplotypes and as a possible confounding factor in the binary logistic regression. European‐derived patients showed a higher frequency of CCR5 wild‐type genotype (conversely, a reduced frequency of Δ32 allele) and a reduced frequency of the HHG*2 haplotype compared to controls; both factors significantly affecting disease risk [p = .003 (OR 3.5, 95%CI 1.6–7.5) and 2.0% vs. 7.2% (residual p = 2.9E − 5), respectively]. Additionally, the HHA/HHB, HHC and HHG*2 haplotype frequencies differed between African‐derived patients and controls [10% vs. 20.5% (residual p = .003), 29.4% vs. 17.4% (residual p = .003) and 3.9% vs. 0.8% (residual p = .023), respectively]. Considering the clinical manifestations of the disease, the CCR5Δ32 presence was confirmed as a susceptibility factor to class IV nephritis in the African‐derived group and when all patients were grouped for comparison [pcorrected = .012 (OR 3.0; 95%CI 3.0–333.3) and pcorrected = .0006 (OR 6.8; 95%CI 1.9–24.8), respectively]. In conclusion, this study indicates that CCR5 promoter polymorphisms are important disease modifiers in SLE. Present data reinforces the CCR5Δ32 polymorphism as a protective factor for the development of the disease in European‐derived patients and as a susceptibility factor for class IV nephritis in African‐derived patients. Furthermore, we also described a reduced frequency of HHA/HHB and an increased frequency of HHC and HHG*2 haplotypes in African‐derived patients, which could modify the CCR5 protein expression in specific cell subsets.
Funder
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Subject
Genetics (clinical),Genetics,Molecular Biology,General Medicine,Immunology
Reference90 articles.
1. Chemokine receptor CCR2/CCR5 polymorphism in Spanish patients with systemic lupus erythematosus;Aguilar F.;The Journal of Rheumatology,2003
2. The role of T helper cell subsets in pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus and their relation to disease activity;Al‐Saleh J.;The Egyptian Journal of Immunology,2006
3. Roles of CCR2 and CXCR3 in the T cell-mediated response occurring during lupus flares