“You might be nice, but where you take me, they're not gonna be”: Preferences for field‐based post‐overdose interventions

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionEmergency medical services (EMS) systems are piloting interventions to respond to overdoses with additional services such as leave‐behind naloxone and medication for opioid use disorder, but little is known about the perspectives of people who use drugs (PWUD) on these interventions being delivered by EMS during an overdose response.MethodsThe Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research guided the development of data collection tools, the analytic strategy and the organisation of results. A community engaged method was used which included both academically trained researchers and community trained researchers who are also PWUD. This study used semi‐structured interviews to gather data from 13 PWUD in King County, Washington in June 2022. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.ResultsThe people interviewed for this study viewed EMS distribution of leave‐behind naloxone and field‐based buprenorphine favourably. They viewed EMS facilitation of hepatitis C virus and HIV testing in the field less favourably and were concerned about stigmas associated with those results. Additional themes emerged regarding: the need for different approaches to post‐overdose care; the need for new services, including post‐overdose trauma counselling and an alternative destination to the emergency department; and the harms of law enforcement presence at overdose responses.Discussion and ConclusionsThis study found strong support for leave‐behind naloxone and field‐initiated buprenorphine. Further training for EMS should include trauma‐informed care and strategies to address burnout and increase compassion. Alternatives to the emergency department as a post‐overdose destination are needed. These strategies should be considered by jurisdictions revising overdose response protocols.