Impact of intracardiac echocardiography usage on the safety of cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation: Subanalysis of the prospective FREEZE cluster cohort study

Author:

Pongratz Janis1ORCID,Kuniss Malte2,Wu Liqun3ORCID,Tebbenjohanns Jürgen4,Nölker Georg5,Dorwarth Uwe1,Kuck Karl‐Heinz6,Jochen Senges7,Hoffmann Ellen1,Straube Florian1ORCID,

Affiliation:

1. Heart Center Munich‐Bogenhausen, Department of Cardiology and Internal Intensive Medicine Munich Clinic Bogenhausen, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Technical University Munich München Bavaria Germany

2. Abteilung für Kardiologie Kerckhoff Klinik GmbH Bad Nauheim Germany

3. Department of Cardiology Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital Shanghai People's Republic of China

4. Med. Klinik I Helios Klinikum Hildesheim GmbH Hildesheim Germany

5. Innere Klinik II/Kardiologie, Christliches Klinikum Unna‐Mitte Unna Germany

6. Stiftung Institut für Herzinfarktforschung Ludwigshafen Germany

7. Kardiologie, LANS Cardio Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionCryoballoon ablation (CBA) aiming at pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) became a standardized atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure. Life‐threatening complications like cardiac tamponade exist. Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) usage is associated with superior safety in radiofrequency ablation. It is unclear if ICE has an impact on safety of CBA.MethodsThe FREEZE Cohort (NCT01360008) subanalysis included patients undergoing “PVI only” CBA. Patients with intraprocedural transesophageal echocardiography were excluded. Group A comprises conventional, group B ICE‐guided CBA. Periprocedural results were compared.ResultsFrom 2011 to 2016, a total of 4189 patients were enrolled, and 1906 (45.5%) were included in this subanalysis, split up in two groups (A: 1066 [55.9%], B: 840 [44.1%]). Group A was younger (60.6 ± 10.8 vs. 62.4 ± 10.5 years, p < .001), with smaller left atria (41 vs. 43 mm, p < .001), and less persistent AF (23.1 vs. 38.1%, p < .001). Procedure, left atrial, and fluoroscopy times were shorter in group A as compared to group B. Dose area product was significantly higher in group A (2911 vs. 2072 cGyxcm2, p < .001).In‐hospital major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac event rates including two deaths in group A were not different between groups (0.5% vs. 0.1%, p = .18). The rate of total procedural (10.4% vs. 5.1%, p < .001) and major complications (3.2% vs. 1.3%, p < .001) was significantly higher in group A. Cardiac tamponade occurred significantly more frequently in group A (8 [0.8%] vs. 1 [0.1%], p = .046). Independent predictors for major complications were female sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.03, p = .03) and non‐ICE usage (OR 2.38, p = .02). No differences were observed for persistent phrenic nerve palsy, nor for groin complications.ConclusionCBA was significantly safer and required less radiation if ICE was used, although the procedures were more complex. The risk of groin complications was not increased with ICE usage. Non‐ICE usage was the only modifiable independent predictor of major complications.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3