Implementation of early intervention clinical services within the National Health System in Italy: Third wave survey with focus on structures, resources, and fidelity to the evidence‐based model

Author:

Meneghelli Anna1,Ciancaglini Panfilo1,Di Domenico Marina1,Mazzola Andrea1,Ghio Lucio2,Preti Antonio13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Associazione Italiana per la Prevenzione e l'Intervento Precoce nella Salute Mentale Milan Italy

2. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Azienda Sanitaria Locale 3 (ASL3) Genova Genoa Italy

3. Department of Neuroscience University of Turin Turin Italy

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEarly intervention in psychosis (EIP) is a well‐established approach aimed at detecting and treating early signs and symptoms of psychosis to prevent its long‐term consequences. The present study aimed at detailing the current status of EIP services in Italy, covering all the Departments of Mental Health (DMHs) operating in 2018.MethodsAll directors of public DMHs operating in Italy in 2018 (n = 127) were invited to fill in a Census form about EIP structure and activities. The first episode psychosis services fidelity scale (FEPS‐FS) was used to investigate fidelity to the EIP model of the centre.ResultsAn active EIP service was reported by 41 DMHs (32% of the total DMHs; 56% of those who took part in the survey). Most EIP services had an autonomous team. The large majority of the Italian EIP centres provided psychosocial interventions to their patients, principally psychotherapy, family support, and psychoeducation. Among those with an active EIP, 29 DMHs filled in the FEPS‐FS. Internal consistency was good when based on the replies of the respondents, but reliability was weak when measured on the basis of an independent evaluation (Cohen's kappa = 0.571). The fidelity to the guidelines for early intervention was uneven, with some criteria met by most centres, especially those peculiar to the Italian community psychiatry.ConclusionA further spreading of the early intervention model across the Italian DMHs was found. A lack of resources might limit the use of specific psychosocial treatments, such as cognitive‐behavioural therapy or manualized family support.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Biological Psychiatry,Psychiatry and Mental health,Pshychiatric Mental Health

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3