Aerosol generation with the use of positive pressure ventilation via supraglottic airway devices: an observational study

Author:

Deng W.1,Nestor C. C.2,Leung K. M. M.2,Chew J.2,Wang H.1,Wang S.1,Irwin M. G.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Mechanical Engineering City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

2. Department of Anaesthesiology University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital Hong Kong Special Administrative Region China

Abstract

SummaryThe amount of aerosol generation associated with the use of positive pressure ventilation via a supraglottic airway device has not been quantified. We conducted a two‐group, two‐centre, prospective cohort study in which we recruited 21 low‐risk adult patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with second‐generation supraglottic airway devices. An optical particle sizer and an isokinetic sampling probe were used to record particle concentrations per second at different size distributions (0.3–10 μm) during use as well as baseline levels during two common activities (conversation and coughing). There was a median (IQR [range]) peak increase of 2.8 (1.5–4.5 [1–28.1]) and 4.1 (2.0–7.1 [1–18.2]) times background concentrations during SAD insertion and removal. Most of the particles generated during supraglottic airway insertion (85.0%) and removal (85.3%) were < 3 μm diameter. Median (IQR [range]) aerosol concentration generated by insertion (1.1 (0.6–5.1 [0.2–22.3]) particles.cm−3) and removal (2.1 (0.5–3.0 [0.1–18.9]) particles.cm−3) of SADs were significantly lower than those produced during continuous talking (44.5 (28.3–70.5 [2.0–134.5]) particles.cm−3) and coughing (141.0 (98.3–202.8 [4.0–296.5]) particles.cm−3) (p < 0.001). The aerosol levels produced were similar with the two devices. The proportion of easily inhaled and small particles (<1 μm) produced during insertion (57.5%) and removal (57.5%) was much lower than during talking (99.1%) and coughing (99.6%). These results suggest that the use of supraglottic airway devices in low‐risk patients, even with positive pressure ventilation, generates fewer aerosols than speaking and coughing in awake patients.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID‐19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans;COVIDSurg Collaborative;British Journal of Surgery,2020

2. ChanA.Infographic for Principles of Airway Management in COVID‐19.https://www.aic.cuhk.edu.hk/covid19/(accessed 22/11/2022).

3. Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID ‐19

4. Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic – a narrative review

5. A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during supraglottic airway insertion and removal

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3