Using language to identify a bladder pain component in women with Dysmenorrhoea‐Related Pelvic Pain: A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Schofield Eleanor1ORCID,Sussex Roland2ORCID,Crotti Tania1ORCID,Evans Susan3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Biomedicine The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

2. Institute for Teaching and Learning Innovation, School of Languages and Cultures The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

3. Adelaide Medical School The University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

BackgroundDysmenorrhoea‐Related Pelvic Pain (DRPP) is a common condition, which may or may not include bladder‐related symptoms. Primary health care practitioners (PHCP) rely heavily on language for diagnosis of DRPP‐related conditions. However, there are no established pain descriptors to assist PHCP to determine whether an individual's DRPP may include a bladder component.AimsTo identify differences in the use of pain descriptors in women with DRPP with and without a co‐existing bladder pain component, through an exploratory study of the language of pelvic pain in women.Materials and MethodsA cross‐sectional online survey of Australian and New Zealand women (n = 750, ages 18–49) who have self‐identified pelvic pain. Free text and predetermined pain descriptors used by women with a self‐perceived bladder pain component (DRPPB+, n = 468) were compared to those without bladder pain (DRPPB−, n = 282). Statistical analysis included Pearson χ2, logistic regression and analysis of variance tests using StataCorp Stata Statistical Software combined with qualitative data from AntConc concordance software.ResultsWithin free‐form text, bloating (P = 0.014) and pressure (P = 0.031) were used more commonly to describe dysmenorrhoea in women with DRPPB+, while the word excruciating (P < 0.001) was more commonly used by women with DRPPB−. From a pre‐determined list of descriptors, pounding (P < 0.001), tingling (P < 0.001), stabbing (P = 0.010), burning (P = 0.002) and cramping (P = 0.021) were more commonly used by women with DRPPB+, than women with DRPPB−.ConclusionsSystematic patterns of word use should encourage practitioners to further enquire about bladder symptoms that may co‐exist with dysmenorrhoea. Knowledge of these words may be useful in targeting diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference26 articles.

1. Prevalence of Chronic Pelvic Pain Among Women: An Updated Review

2. Chronic pelvic pain in women;Ortiz D;Am Fam Physician,2008

3. Patient education: chronic pelvic pain in women (beyond the basics);Tu F;UpToDate,2019

4. Psychology of Chronic Pelvic Pain: Prevalence, Neurobiological Vulnerabilities, and Treatment

5. Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: An Epidemiological Perspective

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3