The impact of body mass index on oncological and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Ong Chloe S.H.1ORCID,Law Terence Y.X.1ORCID,Mok Alex2,Ho Kenny S.C.2,Wang Ziting1ORCID,Chiong Edmund13ORCID,Tiong Ho Yee1,Teoh Jeremy Y.C.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, National University Hospital National University Health System Singapore Singapore

2. S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

3. Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore Singapore

Abstract

ObjectiveTo perform a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on oncological (primary) and surgical (secondary) outcomes of patients who underwent nephrectomy, as obesity or high BMI is a known risk factor for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and predictor of poorer outcomes.MethodsStudies were identified from four electronic databases from database inception to 2 June 2021, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis statement. The review protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews with the identification number: CRD42021275124.ResultsA total of 18 studies containing 13 865 patients were identified for the final meta‐analysis. Regarding oncological outcomes, higher BMI predicted higher overall survival (BMI >25 vs BMI <25 kg/m2: hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58–0.85), cancer‐specific survival (BMI >25 vs BMI <25 kg/m2: HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.50–0.73; BMI 25–30 vs BMI <25 kg/m2: HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23–0.95; BMI >30 vs BMI <25 kg/m2: HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.36–0.69), and recurrence‐free survival rates (BMI >25 vs BMI <25 kg/m2: HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.63–0.82; BMI 25–30 vs BMI <25 kg/m2: HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42–0.82). Those with a lower BMI fared better in surgical outcomes, such as operation time and warm ischaemic time, although the absolute difference was minimal and unlikely to be clinically significant. There was no difference between groups for length of hospital stay, intraoperative or postoperative complications, blood transfusion requirements, and conversion to open surgery.ConclusionOur study suggests that a higher BMI is associated with improved long‐term oncological survival and similar perioperative outcomes as a lower BMI. More research into the underlying biological and physiological mechanisms will enable better understanding of the effect of BMI, beyond mere association, on post‐nephrectomy outcomes.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Urology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3