The determinants of legislation for radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF‐EMFs) with the onset of 5G: An empirical analysis with a worldwide cross‐sectional dataset

Author:

Recuero Virto Laura12,Czerwiński Marek3,Froidevaux Jérémy45

Affiliation:

1. Léonard de Vinci Pôle Universitaire, Research Center Paris La Défense France

2. Economics Departement École polytechnique Palaiseau France

3. Department of Grassland and Natural Landscape Sciences Poznań University of Life Sciences, ul. Dojazd Poznań Poland

4. Biological and Environmental Sciences University of Stirling Stirling UK

5. Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle Paris France

Abstract

AbstractThe unprecedented exposure of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF‐EMF) to humans from mobile communications raises serious public concern about the possibility of unexpected adverse health effects and has stimulated authorities to adopt precautionary exposure limits. These limits are distinctly different across countries, and the causes of these differences are unclear from the literature. This article is the first empirical analysis on the determinants of RF‐EMF exposure legislation, using a novel cross‐sectional database of 164 countries worldwide. The analysis shows that decentralization and mobile competition in countries with low mobile network deployment tend to promote more stringent RF‐EMF exposure limits across the dataset with 164 countries. In more decentralized countries, the regions had a greater influence on national legislation and could accommodate local demands with the advent of mobile technology in the 2000s. In contrast, decentralization and mobile competition in countries with high levels of mobile network deployment tend to relax RF‐EMF exposure limits in the sample of 61 countries with fifth‐generation (5G) technology. Indeed, restrictive RF‐EMF exposure limits are constraining 5G deployment in a context of the widespread adoption of mobile‐broadband technologies. These results should be useful for policymakers and mobile operators alike to anticipate the outcome of legislation in countries that have yet to introduce 5G technology. The results should also be useful when reviewing policies and strategies for the implementation of the upcoming 6G technology in frequency bands that will be increasingly higher (above 6 GHz up to THz for very local usage), and hence where the health effects on humans are less well studied.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference113 articles.

1. Comparison of Probit and Logistic Regression Models in the Analysis of Dichotomous Outcomes

2. Autorité de Régulation des Communications Electroniques de la Poste et de la Distribution de la Presse (ARCEP). (2021).Le Conseil d'Etat rejette l'ensemble des recours déposés contre les décisions de l'Arcep concernant la procédure d'attribution de la bande 3.5 GHz Communiqué de presse 5G mardi 12 octobre 2021. ARCEP Press.

3. Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA). (2021).A report to government on the adequacy of digital platforms’ disinformation and news quality measures. ACMA Press.

4. Agence Nationale de Fréquences (ANFR). (2019).International technical workshop on 5G and EMF exposure for administrations April 17th 2019. ANFR.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3