Lessons identified from applications of the Risk Analysis Quality Test Release 1.0

Author:

Waller Robert123ORCID,Coleman Margaret4ORCID,Denard Samuel5ORCID,Soane Emma6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Protect Heritage Corp. Ottawa Ontario Canada

2. Canadian Museum of Nature Ottawa ON Canada

3. Art Conservation Program Queen's University Kingston Ontario Canada

4. Coleman Scientific Consulting Groton New York USA

5. Empirical Products & Services Houston Texas USA

6. Department of Management The London School of Economics and Political Science London UK

Abstract

AbstractThe Risk Analysis Quality Test Release 1.0 (RAQT1.0) was developed as a framework to encourage mutual understanding between technical risk analysts and risk management decision makers of risk assessment quality indicators. The initial version (release 1.0) was published by the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) in 2020 with the intent of learning from early test applications whether the approach was useful and whether changes in approach or contents would be helpful. The results of applications across three diverse fields are reported here. The applications include both retrospective evaluations of past risk assessments and prospective guidance on the design of future risk assessment projects or systems. The fields represented include Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment, Cultural Property Risk Analysis, and Software Development Cyber Risk Analysis. The RAQT1.0 proved helpful for identifying shortcomings in all applications. Ways in which the RAQT1.0 might be improved are also identified.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference41 articles.

1. Biden J. R.(2023).National cybersecurity strategy.Washington DC USA.https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp‐content/uploads/2023/03/National‐Cybersecurity‐Strategy‐2023.pdf

2. Booth M.(2021).Letter from FSANZ Chief Executive Officer to Ms Rebecca Freer Australian Milk Movement dated 16 March 2021. Personal communication provided by Ms. Freer and available as Appendix B in the report at the link:https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5632b842e4b06192191af6e3/t/61e0af4cf338d8254a79b1b5/1642114903180/CSCreportFSANZ2009critique14October2021.pdf

3. Charette R. N.(2005).Why software fails.IEEE Spectrum.https://spectrum.ieee.org/why‐software‐fails

4. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC). (1999).Principles and guidelines for the conduct of microbiological risk assessment(CAC/GL‐30).https://www.fao.org/fao‐who‐codexalimentarius/sh‐proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https://%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXG%2B30‐1999%252FCXG_030e_2014.pdf

5. Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency. (2021).Software bill of materials| CISA. Retrieved fromhttps://www.cisa.gov/sbom

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3