A risk science perspective on vaccines

Author:

Glette‐Iversen Ingrid1,Aven Terje1,Flage Roger1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Safety, Economics and Planning University of Stavanger Stavanger Norway

Abstract

AbstractVaccines can be seen as one of the greatest successes in modern medicine. Good examples are the vaccines against smallpox, polio, and measles. Unfortunately, vaccines can have side effects, but the risks are considered by the health authorities and experts to be small compared to their benefits. Nevertheless, there are many who are skeptical of vaccination, something which has been very clearly demonstrated in relation to the COVID‐19 disease. Risk is the key concept when evaluating a vaccine, in relation to both its ability to protect against the disease and its side effects. However, risk is a challenging concept to measure, which makes communication about vaccines’ performance and side effects difficult. The present article aims at providing new insights into vaccine risks—the understanding, perception, communication, and handling of them—by adopting what is here referred to as a contemporary risk science perspective. This perspective clarifies the relationships between the risk concept and terms like uncertainty, knowledge, and probability. The skepticism toward vaccines is multifaceted, and influenced by concerns that extend beyond the effectiveness and safety of the vaccines. However, by clarifying the relationships between key concepts of risk, particularly how uncertainty affects risk and its characterization, we can improve our understanding of this issue.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Physiology (medical),Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

Reference99 articles.

1. Guillain‐Barré syndrome in association with COVID‐19 vaccination: A systematic review;Abolmaali M.;Immunologic Research,2022

2. Immune evasion means we need a new COVID‐19 social contract;Atlani‐Duault L.;The Lancet Public Health,2021

3. Implications of black swans to the foundations and practice of risk assessment and management;Aven T.;Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2015

4. Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation;Aven T.;European Journal of Operational Research,2016

5. Aven T.(2021).Characterizing and interpreting health risks: Challenges and suggestions for how to improve current practice. Manuscript Submitted for Publication.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3