Hemodynamic effects of a low versus a high dose of propofol during induction of anesthesia. A randomized trial

Author:

Sjøen Gunnar Helge123,Falk Ragnhild Sørum4,Hauge Tor Hugo5,Tønnessen Tor Inge67,Langesæter Eldrid7

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Haugesund Hospital Haugesund Norway

2. Department of Research and Innovation Haugesund Norway

3. Faculty of Medicine University of Oslo Oslo Norway

4. Oslo Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Support Services Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway

5. Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries Oslo Norway

6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo Oslo Norway

7. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care Oslo University Hospital‐Rikshospitalet Oslo Norway

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundHypotension is common after anesthesia induction with propofol and is associated with increased morbidity. It is important to examine the effects of the proposed interventions to limit preventable hypotension, as suggested by the reduction in the dose of propofol. Our objective was to investigate whether a high dose of propofol is inferior to a low dose with respect to changes in systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP).MethodsThis randomized, double‐blind, dose‐controlled, non‐inferiority study included 68 healthy women scheduled for gynecological surgery at the Day Surgery Unit, Haugesund Hospital, Norway. The patients were randomly allocated 1:1 to a low or high dose (1.4 mg/kg total body weight (TBW) versus 2.7 mg/kg TBW of propofol corresponding to maximal effect site concentrations (Ce) of 2.0 μg/mL versus 4.0 μg/mL. The dose of remifentanil was 1.9–2.0 μg/kg TBW, with maximal Ce of 5.0 ng/mL. The patients were observed for 450 s from the start of the infusions. The first 150 s was the sedation period, after which a bolus of propofol and remifentanil was administered. Baseline was defined as 55–5 s before the bolus doses. LiDCOplus was used for invasive beat‐to‐beat hemodynamic monitoring of changes in SAP, heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). A difference of 10 mmHg in the change in SAP was considered to be clinically important.ResultsThe SAP change difference for low versus high dose was −2.9 mmHg (95% CI −9.0–3.1). The relative changes for low versus high dose were SAP −31% versus −36%, (p < .01); HR −24% versus −20%, (p = .09); SVR −20% versus −31%, (p < .001); SV −16% versus −20%, (p = .04); and CO −35% versus −32%, (p = .33).ConclusionA high dose of propofol was not inferior to a low dose, and a reduction in the dose of propofol did not result in clinically important attenuation of major hemodynamic changes during induction in healthy women.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT 03861364, January 3, 2019.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3