A transfusion risk stratification score to facilitate quality management in cardiopulmonary bypass

Author:

Zhang Qiaoni1,Gao Yuchen2,Tian Yu3,Gao Sizhe1,Diao Xiaolin4,Ji Hongwen2,Wang Yuefu5,Ji Bingyang1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiopulmonary Bypass Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease Beijing China

2. Department of Anesthesiology Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease Beijing China

3. Department of Anesthesiology Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China

4. Department of Information Center Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science and Peking Union Medical College, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Disease Beijing China

5. Surgery Intensive Care Unit & Center of Anesthesia Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University Beijing China

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOur previous showed that a blood management program in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) department, reduced red blood cell (RBC) transfusion and complications, but assessing transfusion practice solely based on transfusion rates was insufficient. This study aimed to design a risk stratification score to predict perioperative RBC transfusion to guide targeted measures for on‐pump cardiac surgery patients.Study Design and MethodsWe analyzed data from 42,435 adult cardiac patients. Eight predictors were entered into the final model including age, sex, anemia, New York Heart Association classification, body surface area, cardiac surgery history, emergency surgery, and surgery type. We then simplified the score to an integer‐based system. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit test, and a calibration curve were used for its performance test. The score was compared to existing scores.ResultsThe final score included eight predictors. The AUC for the model was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76–0.77) and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.76–0.78) in the training and test set, respectively. The calibration curves showed a good fit. The risk score was finally grouped into low‐risk (score of 0–13 points), medium‐risk (14–19 points), and high‐risk (more than 19 points). The score had better predictive power compared to the other two existing risk scores.DiscussionWe developed an effective risk stratification score with eight variables to predict perioperative RBC transfusion for on‐pump cardiac surgery. It assists perfusionists in proactively preparing blood conservation measures for high‐risk patients before surgery.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Hematology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3