Rural general surgical provision from the perspective of twenty‐two rural general surgeons: a thematic analysis

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundAustralia continues to suffer from a geographical maldistribution of general surgical services with only 20% of general surgeons working rurally despite 29% of Australia's population residing outside major metropolitan centres. This qualitative study explored the impact of human capacity and infrastructure upon rural general surgery provision.MethodsThis qualitative study employed semi‐structured interviews of rural general surgeons. Participants were recruited via the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS) Rural newsletter and purposive sampling. All interviews were conducted between January 2023 and April 2023. Transcripts were transcribed, de‐identified, and thematically analysed.ResultsTwo female and 20 male rural general surgeons were interviewed from seven of the eight Australian State or Territories. Four main themes were identified which reflected the impact of human capacity and infrastructure upon Australian rural general surgery provision: (1) small hospital syndrome – and the impact, (2) the rural general surgeon identity, (3) infrastructure and disempowerment and (4) over‐reliance on visiting surgeons.ConclusionImproving access to equitable general surgical care for rural Australians requires appropriate infrastructure and a well‐trained, sustainable multidisciplinary surgical team (human capacity). A greater understanding of the issues may help drive rational, long‐term supportive solutions.