Understanding disagreement within the majority about action to atone for past wrongs-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Understanding disagreement within the majority about action to atone for past wrongs

Published:2013-05-15 Issue: Volume:43 Page:E246-E261
ISSN:0021-9029
Container-title:Journal of Applied Social Psychology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Appl Soc Psychol

Author:

Hartley Lisa Kathryn¹,McGarty Craig¹,Donaghue Ngaire¹

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology; Murdoch University; Murdoch WA Australia

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/jasp.12023/fullpdf

Reference60 articles.

1. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review;Armitage;British Journal of Social Psychology,2001

2. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies

3. The impact of magnitude of harm and perceived difficulty of making reparations on group-based guilt and reparation towards victims of historical harm;Berndsen;European Journal of Social Psychology,2010

4. Perspective taking and opinions about forms of reparation for victims of historical harm;Berndsen;Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2012

5. Manipulating national identity: The strategic use of rhetoric by supporters and opponents of the “Cronulla riots” in Australia;Bliuc;Ethnic and Racial Studies,2012

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How Do Opinions Power the Group Up? A Critical Review of Social Identity Concepts in Opinion-Based Groups;Identity;2024-08-29

2. Divided Attitudes Toward Rectifying Injustice: How Preferences for Indigenous Policies Differ Between the Indigenous and Majority Populations of Norway and Sweden;The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics;2024-01-08

3. Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints.;Psychological Bulletin;2021-07

4. The identification-guilt paradox revisited – Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between group-level self-investment and group-based guilt;Self and Identity;2019-03-16

5. Solving the paradox – (further) evidence for a quadratic relationship between in‐group centrality and group‐based guilt;British Journal of Social Psychology;2019-01-28