Impact of homologous recombination repair/BReast CAncer (BRCA) gene alterations on survival in a real‐world setting of metastatic prostate cancer

Author:

Wenzel Mike1ORCID,Hoeh Benedikt1,Koll Florestan1,Humke Clara1,Fassl Anne1,Reis Henning2,Wild Peter2,Steuber Thomas3,Graefen Markus3,Tilki Derya345ORCID,Traumann Miriam1,Banek Severine1,Chun Felix K.H.1,Mandel Philipp13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany

2. Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt Goethe University Frankfurt am Main Frankfurt Germany

3. Martini‐Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

4. Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg‐Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

5. Department of Urology Koc University Hospital Istanbul Turkey

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate alterations of homologous recombination repair (HRR) and especially BReast CAncer 1/2 (BRCA1/2) gene on overall survival (OS). Moreover, to explore the effect of inhibition of poly(ADP‐ribose)‐polymerase (PARPi) as systemic therapy for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).Patients and methodsOf all HRR‐screened patients with metastatic prostate cancer, baseline characteristics were sampled. Kaplan–Meier estimates and multivariable Cox regression models predicted the effect of HRR/BRCA1/2 alterations on OS.ResultsOf 196 eligible patients, 61 (31%) harboured any HRR and 40 (20%) BRCA1/2 alterations. Of HRR alterations, 40 (66%) vs six (10%) vs five (8.2%) vs four (6.6%) vs two (3.3%) vs four (6.6%) were BRCA1/2 vs Ataxia‐telangiectasia mutated kinase (ATM) vs checkpoint kinase 2 (CHEK2) vs cyclin‐dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) vs Fanconi anaemia complementation Group A (FANCA) vs positive for other mutations. Of these, 30% received a PARPi. OS differed significantly between HRR‐positive vs ‐negative patients. Specifically in hormone‐sensitive prostate cancer, the median OS was 63 (HRR positive) vs 57 (BRCA1/2 positive) vs 113 months (HRR negative) (P ≤ 0.01). In mCRPC, OS was 42 (HRR positive) vs 41 (BRCA1/2 positive) vs 70 months (HRR negative) (P ≤ 0.01). HRR and BRCA1/2 alterations were associated with worse OS after multivariable adjustment. Finally, patients with mCRPC with BRCA1/2 mutation treated without PARPi harboured worse OS than patients with BRCA1/2 mutation and PARPi therapy (median OS: 33 vs 48 months, P < 0.03).ConclusionIncidence of HRR alteration in a clinical real‐world setting is high when using blood‐ and tissue‐based tests. Patients with HRR/BRCA alterations have worse outcomes resulting in significant OS differences between HRR/BRCA‐positive patients with mCRPC with and without PARPi usage vs HRR/BRCA‐negative patients.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3