Affiliation:
1. Servicio de Cardiología Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela Santiago de Compostela Spain
2. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS) Santiago de Compostela Spain
3. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red‐Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV) Madrid Spain
4. A Estrada Health Center, Santiago de Compostela Health Area SERGAS Pontevedra Spain
5. Concepción Arenal Health Center. Santiago de Compostela Health Area SERGAS A Coruña Spain
6. Milladoiro Health Center, Santiago de Compostela Health Area SERGAS A Coruña Spain
Abstract
AbstractAimsTo assess the longer‐term results (hospital admissions and mortality) in women versus men referred to a cardiology department from primary care using an e‐consultation in our outpatient care programme.MethodsWe selected 61,306 patients (30,312 women and 30,994 men) who visited the cardiology service at least once between 2010 and 2021: 69.1% (19,997 women and 20,462 men) were attended in e‐consultation (from 2013 to 2021) and 30.9% (8920 women and 9136 men) in in‐person consultations (from 2010 to 2012) without gender differences in the proportion of patients attended in each period. Using an interrupted time series regression model, we analysed the impact of incorporating e‐consultation into the healthcare model and evaluated the elapsed time to cardiology care, heart failure (HF), cardiovascular (CV), and all‐cause hospital admissions and mortality during the one‐year after cardiology consultation.ResultsThe introduction of e‐consultation substantially decreased waiting times to cardiology care; during the in‐person consultation period, the mean delay for cardiology care was 57.9 (24.8) days in men and 55.8 (22.8) days in women. During the e‐consultation period, the waiting time to cardiology care was markedly reduced to 9.41 (4.02) days in men and 9.46 (4.18) in women. After e‐consultation implantation, there was a significant reduction in the 1‐year rate of hospital admissions and mortality, both in women and men iRR [IC 95%]: 0.95 [0.93–0.96] for HF, 0.90 [0.89–0.91] for CV and 0.70 [0.69–0.71] for all‐cause hospitalization; and 0.93 [0.92–0.95] for HF, 0.86 [0.86–0.87] for CV and 0.88 [0.87–0.89] for all‐cause mortality in women; and 0.91 [0.89–0.92] for HF, 0.90 [0.89–0.91] for CV and 0.72 [0.71–0.73] for all‐cause hospitalization; and 0.96 [0.93–0.97] for HF, 0.87 [95% CI: 0.86–0.87] for CV and 0.87 [0.86–0.87] for all‐cause mortality, in men.ConclusionCompared with the in‐person consultation period, an outpatient care programme that includes an e‐consultation significantly reduced waiting time to cardiology care and was safe, with a lower rate of hospital admissions and mortality in the first year, without significative gender differences.
Subject
Clinical Biochemistry,Biochemistry,General Medicine