How do cytopathologists learn fine needle aspiration techniques? An international survey

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionFine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted diagnostic technique, but performance varies according to expertise. Little is known about variation in FNAC training practices worldwide. We surveyed pathologists using social media networks to determine FNAC training practices internationally.DesignPathologists were surveyed on questions related to FNAC simulation training using direct messaging on the Twitter and WhatsApp platforms. Survey responses over a period of 2 weeks were collected.ResultsIn total, 149 pathologists participated (96.1% response rate). The respondents came from 24 countries and 87 institutions. The majority of the pathologists (63.8%) performed FNAC directly on patients for the first time. Only 36.2% of them had simulation instruction during their training. It was performed on food items such as fruit (64.8%), surgical specimens (37.0%), autopsies (13.0%) and others (9.3%), including commercially available phantom simulators for ultrasound‐guided FNAC (US‐FNAC) (two pathologists).DiscussionMost pathologists did not receive formal training in a simulated environment, and of the pathologists who had simulation instruction, food items were commonly used for education. A few participants used a commercial US‐FNAC simulator, but since most pathologists perform FNAC by palpation, this method of simulation training is not applicable to many practices. Social media is an effective and efficient way to perform survey research, yielding a very high response rate.