How many blood pressure measurements should we take in the office?

Author:

Özkan Gülsüm1ORCID,Ulusoy Şükrü2ORCID,Yılmaz Rahmi3,Değer Serpil Müge4,Derici Ülver5,Arınsoy Turgay5,Erdem Yunus3,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nephrology School of Medicine Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University Tekirdağ Türkiye

2. Department of Nephrology School of Medicine Karadeniz Technical University Trabzon Türkiye

3. Department of Nephrology School of Medicine Hacettepe University Ankara Türkiye

4. Department of Nephrology School of Medicine Dokuz Eylül University İzmir Türkiye

5. Department of Nephrology School of Medicine Gazi University Ankara Türkiye

Abstract

AbstractNo consensus has emerged among different guidelines concerning how many blood pressure (BP) measurements should be performed at office visits in the diagnosis of hypertension. The purpose of this study was to examine the compatibility of various multiple average office BP measurements and 24‐h BP monitoring (ABPM) in patients followed up in the posthoc analysis of the Cappadocia hypertension cohort. A total 1158 office BP measurements by 207 patients were examined. The results were then classified as G1 (average of the 1st and 2nd BP), G2 (average of the 2nd and 3rd), G3 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th), G4 (average of the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th), and G5 (average of all five measurements). Compatibility between the average values in the groups and concomitant 24‐h ABPM data was examined. While a significant difference was observed between daytime 24‐h ABPM SBP and G1 (p = .002), no difference was found in the other groups. Office DBP approached the daytime 24‐h ABPM values as the number of measurements in the five groups increased, although average office DBP data in all groups were higher than daytime 24‐h ABPM DBP (p = .000 for all). In light of our study results, we recommend that three office BP measurements be performed and that the average of the 2nd and 3rd measurements be used for SBP, while in terms of DBP, we recommend that as many measurements as possible be taken without the 1st value being included in the average.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3