Overcoming barriers to reef restoration: field‐based method for approximate genotyping of Acropora cervicornis

Author:

Blanco‐Pimentel Macarena12ORCID,Kenkel Carly D.3ORCID,Kitchen Sheila A.4ORCID,Calle‐Triviño Johanna5ORCID,Baums Iliana B.6ORCID,Cortés‐Useche Camilo5ORCID,Morikawa Megan K.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Wave of Change Iberostar Group Bávaro 23000 Dominican Republic

2. Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences (GELIFES) University of Groningen Nijenborgh 7 Groningen 9747 AG The Netherlands

3. Department of Biological Sciences University of Southern California Los Angeles 90007 California U.S.A.

4. Department of Marine Biology Texas A&M University at Galveston Galveston 77554 Texas U.S.A.

5. Wave of Change Iberostar Group Playa Paraíso 77740 Quintana Roo Mexico

6. Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity (HIFMB) University of Oldenburg Oldenburg 26129 Germany

7. Wave of Change Iberostar Group Miami 33178 Florida U.S.A.

Abstract

Reef restoration efforts aim to enhance resilience by safeguarding the genetic diversity of coral populations. This could be facilitated by genotyping methods that are relatively inexpensive, and field‐based. A potential method for assessing coral genotypic diversity arises from self‐recognition phenomena. Past studies have shown that contact between tissues from the same genet (isogeneic) will fuse whereas tissue from different genets (allogeneic) will result in rejection. However, the accuracy of this method has been questioned. Here, we revisit the grafting method as a tool to estimate genotypic diversity in a Caribbean coral restoration target, Acropora cervicornis. Ten ramets of unknown genetic relation were arranged in 82 grafting tests consisting of 5‐fragment bundles that replicated all possible combinations between ramets. After 10 weeks, we found that outcomes of acceptance and rejection were highly consistent (96.7% across all combinations and replicates). The proposed existence of 4 genets across the 10 ramets based on response outcomes was confirmed by two SNP‐based genotyping methods. Both genet pairing (isogeneic or allogeneic pairs) and genetic distance significantly affected the odds of acceptance or rejection responses. Moreover, a significant correlation was found between the degree of fusion between fragments and their genetic distance, supporting that the most related ramets are accepted more strongly compared to those that are more unrelated. This field‐based contact method can be a powerful tool to estimate genotypic diversity in coral nurseries, facilitating the management of genetic diversity within the nursery and genotype‐level tracking of key traits like disease and bleaching resistance.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3