Affiliation:
1. Department of English and American Studies Philipps University of Marburg Marburg Germany
2. Department of English Justus Liebig University Giessen Giessen Germany
Abstract
AbstractThe present paper provides a corpus‐based study of war and corruption metaphors in South Asian Englishes (specifically Indian English, Bangladeshi English, Nepali English and Pakistani English). Considering the highly news‐relevant nature of these concepts, the South Asian Varieties of English corpus (SAVE2020) serves as the database. In an initial step, we outline the source domains at different levels of schematicity used to construe war and corruption, revealing the salient domains at location and person. By pursuing a multifactorial approach, this study aims at answering the question whether the choice of source domain is governed by the sociolinguistic factors gender and variety, and intra‐linguistic factors, for example, length and semantic prosody of the metaphor‐related words. It furthermore investigates whether multifactorial analyses, which are still a novelty within research on metaphor variation, constitute a suitable methodological approach. By doing so, our research demonstrates the need to complement this quantitative approach with a qualitative one that offers a more fine‐grained description of the source domains used to structure metaphorical concepts like war and corruption.
Reference38 articles.
1. Metaphors, Communication and Effectiveness in Indian Politics
2. Semantic preference and semantic prosody re-examined
3. quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual data
4. Bernaisch T. Heller B. &Mukherjee J.(2021).Manual for the 2020‐update of the South Asian Varieties of English (SAVE2020) corpus version 1.1.Justus Liebig University Department of English.