A retrospective review of elevated lead impedances in impedance‐dependent magnetic resonance‐conditional spinal cord stimulation devices

Author:

Mullins Cormac Francis12ORCID,Harris Stephany1,Pang David1

Affiliation:

1. Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust London UK

2. South Infirmary Victoria University Hospital Cork Ireland

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesAdvances in Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) device technology in recent years have led to the development of SCS systems that are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)‐conditional, most of which are dependent on normal lead impedances. The objective of this study was to retrospectively analyze the rate of elevated lead impedance in these devices to determine the rate of failure of MR‐conditional modes.Materials and MethodsThis was a single‐center, retrospective, chart‐based review conducted during a five‐year period. Patients were included if they had been implanted with an impedance‐dependent MR‐conditional SCS and had a documented impedance check at least 6 months after implantation. A Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to map the survival of MR‐conditionality over time.ResultsThere were 363 cases included between 2015 and 2020, which corresponded to a total of 602 SCS leads. Nevro was the most common manufacturer (67.8%), followed by Boston Scientific (22.3%) and Abbott (9.9%). The average overall follow‐up time was 2.25 years. Overall, 67 (18.5%) of patients had lead impedances over 10,000 Ω at follow‐up with a total of 186 electrode contacts (3.9%). Leads most commonly had either one (40%), two (22%) or three (12%) electrode contacts out of range. Risk of failure of lead impedances increased by 35.4% with each successive year to a peak of 43% of all leads by year 5. Mean overall survival time of normal lead impedances was 4.77 years (CI 4.40–5.13). There was no statistically significant difference in mean overall survival time between Abbott (M = 4.0 years, SD = 1.25), Boston Scientific (M = 4.64 years, SD = 1.75) and Nevro (M = 4.80 years, SD = 3.28), χ2 (2, N = 358) = 1.511, p = 0.47; however, Abbott leads had a greater total number of failed impedance contacts (50/568, 8.8%), in comparison to Nevro (124/3064, 4.0%), χ2 (1, N = 3630) = 23.76, p < 0.00001, at a similar follow‐up time.ConclusionThis retrospective study identified elevated impedances in 18.5% of MR‐conditional SCS devices at an average of 2.25 years follow‐up resulting in loss of MR‐conditionality and a mean overall lead survival time of 4.77 years for normal lead impedance.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3