Precision medicine in regulatory decision making: Biomarkers used for patient selection in European Public Assessment Reports from 2018 to 2020

Author:

Bakker Elisabeth1ORCID,Starokozhko Viktoriia12,Kraaijvanger Jet W. M.23,Heerspink Hiddo J. L.1,Mol Peter G. M.12

Affiliation:

1. University Medical Centre Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The Netherlands

2. Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board, CBG‐MEB Utrecht The Netherlands

3. VU University Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractBiomarkers can guide precision medicine in clinical trials and practice. They can increase clinical trials' efficiency through selection of study populations more likely to benefit from treatment, thus increasing statistical power and reducing sample size requirements or study duration. We performed a narrative synthesis to explore biomarker utilization for patient selection to guide precision medicine trials in marketing authorization dossiers of centrally approved medicines in Europe between 2018 and 2020 and analyzed in‐depth those that eventually included biomarkers in the medicines' indications. From 119 eligible products, 26 included a biomarker in the indication, of which most were oncology products (n = 15). Included biomarkers were often known from literature or from previously approved products in the European Union or the United States. Additionally, 52 dossiers mentioned one or more biomarkers for patient selection in their clinical efficacy and safety information. Although these were not always included in the medicines' indication, they were often implicitly embedded in condition definitions adopted from clinical guidelines or practice. In 15 out of the 26 medicines with a biomarker‐guided indication, only biomarker‐positive populations were included in the main clinical studies supporting the marketing authorization. These studies were mostly randomized controlled trials or single‐arm trials; only two products were studied for multiple indications in an innovative basket trial. Definitions of biomarkers could be subject of debate and needed adaptation after post hoc analyses requested by the assessment committee in four cases, stressing the importance of thorough justification of these definitions to include the right population for an optimal benefit–risk balance, enabling precise medicine.

Funder

Innovative Medicines Initiative

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference51 articles.

1. European Commission.Personalised medicine: Background conference reports publications and links related to personalised medicine. Accessed July 18 2023.https://research‐and‐innovation.ec.europa.eu/research‐area/health/personalised‐medicine_en

2. Clinical trial design in the era of precision medicine

3. The Personalized Medicine Coalition

4. Translational precision medicine: an industry perspective

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3