The use of microtracers in food‐effect trials: An alternative study design for toxic drugs with long half‐lives exemplified by the case for alectinib

Author:

van der Heijden L. T.12ORCID,Steeghs N.3,Beijnen J. H.124,Huitema A. D. R.1256,Dorlo T. P. C.127ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Division of Pharmacology Antoni van Leeuwenhoek/The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Pharmacology Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/The Netherlands Cancer Institute Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Division of Pharmaco‐epidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

5. Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands

6. Department of Pharmacology Princess Maxima Center Utrecht The Netherlands

7. Department of Pharmacy Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

Abstract

AbstractThe traditional design of food‐effect studies has a high patient burden for toxic drugs with long half‐lives (e.g., anticancer agents). Microtracers could be used to assess food‐effect in patients without influencing their ongoing treatment. The feasibility of a microtracer food‐effect study during steady‐state of the therapeutic drug was investigated in an in silico simulation study with alectinib as an example for a relative toxic drug with a long half‐life. Microtracer pharmacokinetics were simulated based on a previously published population pharmacokinetic model and used for estimation of a model with and a model without food as a covariate on oral bioavailability of alectinib (assuming a 40% food‐effect). Power was defined as the fraction of clinical trials where a significant (p < 0.01) food‐effect was identified. The proposed study design of 10 patients on steady‐state treatment, 10 blood samples collected within 24 h after administration and an assumed food‐effect of 40% had a power of 99.9%. The mean estimated food‐effect was 39.8% (80% confidence interval: 31.0%–48.6%). The feasibility of microtracer food‐effect studies was demonstrated. The design of the microtracer food‐effect study allowed estimation of the food‐effect with minimal influence on therapeutic treatment and reducing patient burden compared to the traditional study design for toxic drugs with long half‐lives.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference23 articles.

1. Food Effect Studies for Oncology Drug Products

2. Effects of Food on the Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Anticancer Agents

3. Food Effect Study Design With Oral Drugs: Lessons Learned From Recently Approved Drugs in Oncology

4. European Medicines Agency (EMA).Guideline on the investigationof drug interactions.2012. Accessed July 14 2022.https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific‐guideline/guideline‐investigation‐drug‐interactions‐revision‐1_en.pdf

5. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).Food effect bioavailability and fed bioequivalence studies.2002. Accessed July 14 2022.https://www.fda.gov/media/70945/download

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3