Affiliation:
1. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery Texas Children's Hospital Austin Texas USA
2. Department of Neurosurgery Baylor College of Medicine Houston Texas USA
3. Department of Neurological Surgery University of Louisville School of Medicine Louisville Kentucky USA
4. Department of Neurological Surgery University of Minnesota Minneapolis Minnesota USA
5. Pediatric Neurosurgery Norton Neuroscience Institute Louisville Kentucky USA
6. Pediatric Neurosurgery Children's Healthcare of Atlanta Atlanta Georgia USA
7. Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery Texas Children's Hospital Houston Texas USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesA surgical “treatment gap” in pediatric epilepsy persists despite the demonstrated safety and effectiveness of surgery. For this reason, the national surgical landscape should be investigated such that an updated assessment may more appropriately guide health care efforts.MethodsIn our retrospective cross‐sectional observational study, the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was queried for individuals 0 to <18 years of age who had an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for drug‐resistant epilepsy (DRE). This cohort was then split into a medical group and a surgical group. The former was defined by ICD codes for ‐DRE without an accompanying surgical code, and the latter was defined by DRE and one of the following epilepsy surgeries: any open surgery; laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT); vagus nerve stimulation; or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) from 1998 to 2020. Demographic variables of age, gender, race, insurance type, hospital charge, and hospital characteristics were analyzed between surgical options. Continuous variables were analyzed with weight‐adjusted quantile regression analysis, and categorical variables were analyzed by weight‐adjusted counts with percentages and compared with weight‐adjusted chi‐square test results.ResultsThese data indicate an increase in epilepsy surgeries over a 22‐year period, primarily due to a statistically significant increase in open surgery and a non‐significant increase in minimally invasive techniques, such as LITT and RNS. There are significant differences in age, race, gender, insurance type, median household income, Elixhauser index, hospital setting, and size between the medical and surgical groups, as well as the procedure performed.SignificanceAn increase in open surgery and minimally invasive surgeries (LITT and RNS) account for the overall rise in pediatric epilepsy surgery over the last 22 years. A positive inflection point in open surgery is seen in 2005. Socioeconomic disparities exist between medical and surgical groups. Patient and hospital sociodemographics show significant differences between the procedure performed. Further efforts are required to close the surgical “treatment gap.”