Causes and effects of sampling bias on marine Western Atlantic biodiversity knowledge

Author:

Cardoso Micaele Niobe Martins1ORCID,Azevedo Fernanda2,Dias Alan3,de Almeida Ana Carolina Sousa4,Senna André R.5,Marques Antonio C.6,Rezende Dafinny7,Hajdu Eduardo7,Lopes‐Filho Erick Alves Pereira78,Pitombo Fábio Bettini9,de Oliveira Gabriela Moura3,Doria João Gabriel10,Carraro João Luís8,De‐Paula Joel Campos8,Bahia Juliana11,de Araujo Juliana Magalhães12,Paresque Karla13,Vieira Leandro Manzoni3,Fernandes Luanny Martins8,Santos Luciano N.8ORCID,Miranda Lucília Souza14,Lorini Maria Lucia8,Klautau Michelle15,Pagliosa Paulo Roberto10,Clerier Pedro Henrique Braga7,de Moura Rafael B.16,da Rocha Fortes Rafael8,Neves Raquel A. F.8,da Rocha Rosana Moreira17,Stampar Sérgio N.2,Salani Sula18,Miranda Thaís Pires19,Pinheiro Ulisses3,Venekey Virág20,Oliveira Ubirajara21ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Instituto de Ciências do Mar (Labomar) Universidade Federal do Ceará Fortaleza Brazil

2. LEDALab, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Estadual Paulista Bauru Brazil

3. Departamento de Zoologia Universidade Federal de Pernambuco Recife Brazil

4. Museu de História Natural da Bahia Universidade Federal da Bahia Salvador Brazil

5. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

6. Departamento de Zoologia Universidade de São Paulo São Paulo Brazil

7. Laboratório de Taxonomia de Poríferos, Departamento de Invertebrados, Museu Nacional Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

8. Instituto de Biociências Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

9. Laboratório de Ecologia e Sistemática de Cirripedia, Departamento de Biologia Marinha Universidade Federal Fluminense Rio de Janeiro Brazil

10. Laboratório de Biodiversidade Costeira Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Florianópolis Brazil

11. Zoologische Staatsammlung München Staatliche Naturwissenschaftliche Sammlungen Bayerns München Germany

12. Instituto Nacional de Divulgação Pública de Ciência e Tecnologia (INCT‐CPCT) Rio de Janeiro Brazil

13. Universidade Federal de Alagoas Maceió Brazil

14. Departamento de Zoologia Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil

15. Laboratório TaxoN, Departamento de Zoologia Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

16. Laboratório de Benthos, Departamento de Biologia Marinha Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil

17. Laboratório de Sistemática e Ecologia de Invertebrados Marinhos, Departamento de Zoologia Universidade Federal Do Paraná Curitiba Brazil

18. Laboratório de Bentos, Departamento de Zoologia Universidade de Brasília Brasília Brazil

19. Departamento de Biologia Animal e Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas Universidade Estadual de Londrina Londrina Brazil

20. Laboratório de Pesquisa em Monitoramento Ambiental Marinho (LAPMAR) Universidade Federal do Pará Belém Brazil

21. Centro de Sensoriamento Remoto Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil

Abstract

AbstractAimKnowledge gaps and sampling bias can lead to underestimations of species richness and distortions in the known distribution of species. The goal of this study is to identify potential gaps and biases in marine organisms sampling at the Western Atlantic Ocean, determine their causes and assess its effect on biodiversity metrics. We tested the potential interference of this bias with the representation of environmental conditions, potentially affecting biodiversity model predictions.LocationWestern Atlantic Ocean.MethodsThis study compiled data of marine species in online and institutional databases. The analysis of sampling effort and bias was conducted by mapping the density of records. A spatial autoregressive model (SAR) was employed to investigate the influence of accessibility as a determinant factor of the sampling bias. We tested whether the effect of the sampling bias could result from environmental bias in the samples, contrasting the environmental variables of the study area with those present in the biodiversity records. We examined the correlation between sampling effort in species richness and endemism.ResultsThe USA has the highest number of records and density of records. There was a low correlation between the vertebrates, invertebrates and algae sample density patterns. Accessibility was identified as one of the main causes of sampling bias. The analysis of environmental bias indicated that the records do not represent all conditions present in the environment. Sampling density showed a strong relationship with endemism and a weaker relationship with species richness.Main ConclusionsWe have identified a strong sampling bias related to ease of access that equally affects vertebrates, invertebrates and algae, resulting in a skewed sampling of the environmental conditions where species occur. Sampling patterns differ among the groups. The intensity of sampling effort significantly impacts measures of richness and endemism, potentially undermining the accurate recognition of real biological diversity patterns.

Funder

Fundação Grupo Boticário de Proteção à Natureza

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3