Affiliation:
1. School of Education and Professional Studies Griffith University Mount Gravatt QLD Australia
2. School of Education The University of Queensland St Lucia QLD Australia
Abstract
AbstractEven at the primary level, computational thinking (CT) can support young students to prepare for participating in futures that are immersed in data. In mathematics classrooms, there are few explanations of the ways CT can support students in formulating and solving complex problems. This paper presents an example of a primary classroom investigation (8‐9 year olds) over seven lessons of the problem “How long does it take to read a book?” The aim is to illustrate ways a statistical investigation can provide context for CT and demonstrate how the two complement each other to solve problems involving mathematics. The findings highlight opportunities and challenges that students face across the elements of CT—decomposition, abstraction, pattern recognition and modelling, and generalization and algorithmic thinking, including recommendations for teaching.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Subject
Education,Statistics and Probability
Reference36 articles.
1. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA).Australian Curriculum: Digital Technologies.2014ahttps://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f‐10‐curriculum/technologies/digital‐technologies/structure/.
2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA).Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. version 8.42014bhttps://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f‐10‐curriculum/mathematics/.
3. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA).Australian Curriculum: Mathematics. version 92022https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.
4. Reflective abstraction in computational thinking
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献