Decisional conflict in parents of children with congenital heart defect: Towards development of a model

Abstract

AbstractAimThis study aimed to develop a model to help parents cope with decisional conflict.BackgroundParents of children with congenital heart defect experience decisional conflict when they are uncertain about treatment decisions for their child, which may lead to delay in seeking care or distress over the decision made.DesignCorrelational design with model building and data triangulation was used.MethodsData were collected through surveys and interviews with a consecutive sample of 221 parent respondents from June to December 2018. Structural equation modelling and qualitative data analysis were used.ResultsLower decisional conflict was seen in parents with higher income, more nurse support and physician risk communication. Time delay for surgery was correlated with the child's age, social service coverage, and social support. Decisional conflict mediated the influence of income, nurse support and physician risk communication on satisfaction with decision. Based on model fit parameters, the emerging model is a good and parsimonious model of decisional conflict. The overall theme, ‘Deciding for Surgery: What Matters Most’, described the processes parents went through in making treatment decisions.ConclusionNurses may help parents feel more certain, less conflicted, and more satisfied with their decision by addressing factors including knowledge gaps, personal values, available support, and resource access.