Affiliation:
1. Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology University of North Carolina at Charlotte Charlotte North Carolina USA
2. Loss Prevention Research Council Gainesville Florida USA
3. Department of Justice, Law & Criminology American University Washington District of Columbia USA
Abstract
AbstractBackground and ObjectivesSynthetic cannabinoids (SCs) may function as a marijuana alternative for soldiers subject to frequent drug screens, yet no study has interviewed past military users of SCs.MethodsVeterans participating in eight US veterans treatment courts were interviewed (n = 318; response rate = 54.9%). Thematic analyses were completed.ResultsSixty‐five veterans (21.3%) reported SC use. Three major themes were identified: SCs were not a suitable marijuana replacement, the experience was unpleasant/problematic, and curiosity, sometimes paired with the perception of safely eluding drug screens, facilitated use.Conclusion and Scientific SignificanceWhile members of the military experimented with SCs, habitual use of SCs within the Armed Forces does not appear widespread. The perception that SCs are excluded from all urinalyses may contribute to experimentation, but the unpleasant experience generally discourages recurrent use.
Funder
National Institute of Justice
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Medicine (miscellaneous)