Exploring the impact of remoteness on people with head and neck cancer: Utilisation of a state‐wide dataset

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveLiving in regional/rural areas can impact outcomes for people with head and neck cancer (HNC). Using a comprehensive state‐wide dataset, the impact of remoteness on key service parameters and outcomes for people with HNC was examined.MethodsRetrospective quantitative analysis of routinely collected data held within the Queensland Oncology Repository.DesignQuantitative methods (descriptive statistics, multivariable logistic regression and geospatial analysis).SettingAll people diagnosed with HNC in Queensland, Australia.ParticipantsThe impact of remoteness was examined in 1991 people (1171 metropolitan, 485 inner‐regional, 335 rural) with HNC cancer diagnosed between 2013 and 2015.Main Outcome MeasuresThis paper reports key demographics and tumour characteristics (age, gender, socioeconomic status, First Nations status, co‐morbidities, primary tumour site and staging), service use/uptake (treatment rates, attendance at multidisciplinary team review and timing to treatment) and post‐acute outcomes (readmission rates, causes of readmission and 2‐year survival). In addition to this, the distribution of people with HNC across QLD, distances travelled and patterns of readmission were also analysed.ResultsRegression analysis revealed remoteness significantly (p < 0.001) impacted access to MDT review, receiving treatment, and time to treatment commencement, but not readmission or 2‐year survival. Reasons for readmission did not differ by remoteness, with dysphagia, nutritional inadequacies, gastrointestinal disorders and fluid imbalance indicated in the majority of readmissions. Rural people were significantly (p < 0.0001) more likely to travel to care and to readmit to a different facility than provided primary treatment.ConclusionsThis study provides new insights into the health care disparities for people with HNC residing in regional/rural areas.