Immunoprophylaxis for rhesus disease-expensive but worth it?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Immunoprophylaxis for rhesus disease-expensive but worth it?

Published:1991-06 Issue:6 Volume:98 Page:509-512
ISSN:1470-0328
Container-title:BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
language:en
Short-container-title:BJOG:An international journal of O&G

Author:

Selinger Mark

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1991.tb10360.x/fullpdf

Reference17 articles.

1. Cost implications of routine antenatal administration of Rh immuné globulin

2. Deaths from Rh(D) haemolytic disease of the newborn in England and Wales.

3. N. R. Butler, and D. G. Bonham (1963 ) Perinatal Mortality : The First Report of the 1958 British Perinatal Mortality Survey. LivingstoneEdinburgh, pp.186 -200 .

4. Further Experimental Studies on the Prevention of Rh Haemolytic Disease

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Algal viruses;Applied Plant Virology;2020

2. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for RhD-negative women: a systematic review and economic evaluation;Health Technology Assessment;2009-02

3. Monoclonal anti-D antibodies to prevent alloimmunization: lessons from clinical trials;Transfusion Clinique et Biologique;2006-03

4. Analyse économique de la prévention de l’immunisation anti-D;Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction;2006-02

5. The economics of routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for pregnant women who are rhesus negative;BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology;2004-09