Interventions to improve emergency department throughput and care delivery indicators: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Youssef Elias1,Benabbas Roshanak1,Choe Brittany1,Doukas Donald1,Taitt Hope A.1,Verma Rajesh1,Zehtabchi Shahriar1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Emergency Medicine New York Health + Hospitals/Kings County Hospital Brooklyn New York USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding has repercussions on acute care, contributing to prolonged wait times, length of stay, and left without being seen (LWBS). These indicators are regarded as systemic shortcomings, reflecting a failure to provide equitable and accessible acute care. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving ED care delivery indicators.MethodsThis was a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing ED interventions aimed at reducing key metrics of time to provider (TTP), time to disposition (TTD), and LWBS. We excluded disease‐specific trials (e.g., stroke). We used Cochrane's revised tool to assess the risk of bias and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations to rate the quality of evidence. The meta‐analysis was performed using a random‐effects model and Cochrane Q test for heterogeneity. Data were summarized as means (±SD) for continuous variables and risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsWe searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other major databases. A total of 1850 references were scanned and 20 RCTs were selected for inclusion. The trials reported at least one of the three outcomes of TTD, TTP, or LWBS. Most interventions focused on triage liaison physician and point‐of‐care (POC) testing. Others included upfront expedited workup (ordering tests before full evaluation by a provider), scribes, triage kiosks, and sending notifications to consultants or residents. POC testing decreased TTD by an average of 5–96 min (high heterogeneity) but slightly increased TTP by a mean difference of 2 min (95% CI 0.6–4 min). Utilizing a triage liaison physician reduced TTD by 28 min (95% CI 19–37 min; moderate‐quality evidence) and was more effective in reducing LWBS than routine triage (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66–0.88; moderate quality).ConclusionsOperational strategies such as POC testing and triage liaison physicians could mitigate the impact of ED crowding and appear to be effective. The current evidence supports these strategies when tailored to the appropriate practice environment.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference68 articles.

1. Emergency department overcrowding and access block

2. The International Federation for Emergency Medicine report on emergency department crowding and access block: A brief summary

3. The Effect of Emergency Department Crowding on Clinically Oriented Outcomes

4. Emergency Medicine Practice Committee.Emergency Department Crowding: High Impact Solutions. American College of Emergency Physicians. May2016. Accessed February 5 2024.https://www.acep.org/siteassets/sites/acep/media/crowding/empc_crowding‐ip_092016.pdf

5. Emergency department crowding is associated with 28-day mortality in community-acquired pneumonia patients

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3