Temporomandibular joint disc position and shape in patients submitted to two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion and face mask therapy: A randomized clinical trial

Author:

Tagawa Daniella Torres12ORCID,Wolosker Angela Maria Borri1ORCID,Florez Bruna Maluza2ORCID,Dominguez Gladys Cristina3ORCID,Yamashita Helio Kiitiro1ORCID,Aidar Luís Antônio de Arruda2ORCID,Junior Henrique Carrete1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Graduate Program in Medicine (Clinical Radiology) Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) São Paulo Brazil

2. Department of Orthodontics Universidade Santa Cecília Santos Brazil

3. Department of Orthodontics Universidade de São Paulo (USP) São Paulo Brazil

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this prospective study was to assess possible changes in the position and shape of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) articular disc in patients treated with two protocols of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and face mask (FM) therapy.MethodsA sample of 88 patients with Class III or Class III subdivision malocclusions, aged between 6 and 13 years, were consecutively selected and divided into three groups (G): G1‐34 patients were treated with RME, followed by FM therapy; G2‐34 patients were treated using RME according to modified alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction (ALT‐RAMEC) protocol, followed by FM therapy. These treated groups were randomly (1:1 allocation ratio) distributed according to the two treatment protocols. G3 – Control Group – 20 untreated patients were followed. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) TMJs were obtained before (T1) and after (T2) a treatment period or follow‐up. McNemar test, Fisher's exact test and intra‐ and inter‐observer concordance (K) were performed (p ≤ .05).ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences in the baseline cephalometric variables at T1 between the groups. There were statistically significant differences between the groups (p < .001) in relation to the disc shape in T1, since G1 (8 TMJs −11.76%) presented higher occurrences of altered forms in comparison with G2 (no changes). No significant differences were observed in disc position CM and OM (G1 – p > .999; G2 – p = .063; G3 – p = .500) and shape (G1 – p > 0.999; G2 – p = .250; G3 – not calculable), between T1 × T2, in any of the groups studied.ConclusionThe two treatment protocols did not have adverse effects on the position and shape of the TMJ disc, in a short‐term evaluation.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

Wiley

Reference40 articles.

1. The dilemma of class III treatment;Campbell PM;Angle Orthod,1983

2. Components of class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents;Guyer EC;Angle Orthod,1986

3. A New Protocol for Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Patients: Repetitive Weekly Protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions

4. Maxillary growth: therapeutic conclusions;Delaire J;Trans Eur Orthod Soc,1971

5. The effects of two methods of Class III malocclusion treatment on temporomandibular disorders

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3