Circuit Class Therapy or Seven-Day Week Therapy for Increasing Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy after Stroke (CIRCIT): A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author:

English Coralie12,Bernhardt Julie2,Crotty Maria3,Esterman Adrian4,Segal Leonie5,Hillier Susan1

Affiliation:

1. International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, Sansom Institute of Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

2. Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Austin Campus, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia

3. Department of Rehabilitation and Aged Care, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia

4. Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

5. Health Economics and Social Policy Group, Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Abstract

Background Increased therapy has been linked to improvements in functional ability of people with stroke. Aim To determine the effectiveness of two alternative models of increased physiotherapy service delivery (seven-day week therapy or group circuit class therapy five days a week) to usual care. Method Three-armed randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcome. People admitted with a diagnosis of stroke, previously independently ambulant and with a moderate level of disability were recruited. ‘Usual care’ was individual physiotherapy provided five-days a week. Seven-day week therapy was usual care physiotherapy provided seven-days a week. Participants in the circuit class therapy arm of the trial received physiotherapy in group circuit classes in two 90-min sessions, five-days a week. Primary outcome was distance walked on the six-minute walk test at four-weeks post-randomization. Results Two hundred eighty-three participants were randomized; primary outcome data were available for 259 (92%). In the seven-day arm participants received an additional three hours of physiotherapy and thosein the circuit class armanadditional 22 h. There were no significant between-group differences at four-weeks in walking distance ( P = 0·72). Length of stay was shorter for seven-day (mean difference −2·9 days, 95% confidence interval −17·9 to 12·0) and circuit class participants (mean difference −9·2 days, 95% confidence interval −24·2 to 5·8) compared to usual care, but this was not significant. Conclusions Both seven-day therapy and group circuit class therapy increased physiotherapy time, but walking outcomes were equivalent to usual care.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3