Affiliation:
1. College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA
2. Odum School of Ecology University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
3. Department of Biology SUNY Buffalo State University Buffalo New York USA
Abstract
Abstract1. Non‐native species may be the cause of native species declines or an effect of habitat degradations that promote the former and damage the latter. Social insects are extraordinarily successful organisms, and non‐native social insects, such as ants, often are very successful invaders of novel habitats.2. The red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) and the Asian needle ant (Brachyponera chinensis) are widespread non‐native invaders in the eastern United States that bring ecological, economic and social impacts, but their putative effects on native ant communities may be concomitant with habitat degradation rather than inherent in their invasion.3. Given this gap in understanding, our goal was to examine how experimental warming influenced native and non‐native ant communities. Specifically, we hypothesised that (a) non‐native ant abundance and species richness will increase in warmed plots and that (b) warming‐induced increases in the non‐native ant populations will correspond with decreases in native ant abundance and species richness.4. To test these hypotheses, we used three levels of experimental forest edge soil warming (warming targeted at +0, +3, and +5°C above ambient soil temperature) in a mixed deciduous forest in the Georgia (USA) Piedmont. We used repeated pitfall trapping to investigate how the experimental warming influenced the composition of native and non‐native ant communities with a focus on how warming combined with S. invicta and B. chinensis invasion impacted native ant communities.5. Our results suggest that experimental warming promoted the non‐native invasive ants, particularly S. invicta and B. chinensis. We also found that B. chinensis somewhat inhibited native ant communities, but not because of warming. The warmed environment benefited both non‐native invasive ants at the expense of native ants but, given that B. chinensis negatively impacted the native ants with far fewer workers than S. invicta, B. chinensis may pose a greater threat to native ant communities than S. invicta in a warmer world.