Responsibility to future generations: A strategy for combatting climate change across political divides

Author:

Syropoulos Stylianos12ORCID,Law Kyle Fiore3,Kraft‐Todd Gordon1,Mah Andrea4,Markowitz Ezra5,Young Liane1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Boston College Boston Massachusetts USA

2. The Schiller Institute for Integrated Science and Society Boston College Boston Massachusetts USA

3. Department of Psychology State University of New York, University at Albany Albany New York USA

4. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts USA

5. Department of Environmental Conservation University of Massachusetts Amherst Massachusetts USA

Abstract

AbstractIndividuals and governments often fail to take action to address climate change owing largely to widespread politicization of the issue and related discourse. In response to recent appeals for non‐partisan approaches to pro‐environmentalism, we propose that highlighting one's responsibility to future generations (RFG) could offer promise across the political spectrum. We argue that RFG may be effective because it is widely endorsed, uncorrelated with demographic indicators and less tied to political ideology compared to other forms of responsibility, such as personal responsibility for climate change mitigation. Across six main and seven supplementary studies (N = 161,633), we provide evidence for these claims. RFG is not only widely endorsed across countries and demographic groups but it also significantly predicts various measures of pro‐environmental behaviour, both in correlational and pre‐registered experimental contexts. These findings confirm established effects, reconcile inconsistencies and suggest prioritizing intergenerational responsibility may effectively reshape climate change narratives for the most resistant parties.

Funder

John Templeton Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Reference66 articles.

1. Alper B. A.(2022).How religion intersects with Americans' views on the environment. Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project.https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2022/11/17/how‐religion‐intersects‐with‐americans‐views‐on‐the‐environment/

2. “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: Visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behavior

3. Moral expansiveness: Examining variability in the extension of the moral world.

4. The relationships of political ideology and party affiliation with environmental concern: A meta-analysis

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3