Confounding mitigation for the exposure‐response relationship of bevacizumab in colorectal cancer patients

Abstract

AimsThe exposure‐response relationship of bevacizumab may be confounded by various factors, including baseline characteristics, time‐dependent target engagement and recursive relationships between exposure and response, requiring effective mitigation. This study aimed to investigate the exposure‐response relationships of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients while mitigating potential biases.MethodsBevacizumab pharmacokinetics was described using target‐mediated drug disposition modelling. Relationships between target kinetics, progression‐free (PFS) and overall (OS) survivals were assessed using joint pharmacokinetic and parametric hazard function models. Both prognostic‐driven and response‐driven potential biases were mitigated. These models evaluated the impact of increased antigen target levels, clearance and intensified dosing regimen on survival.ResultsEstimated target‐mediated pharmacokinetic parameters in 130 assessed patients were baseline target levels (R0 = 8.4 nM), steady‐state dissociation constant (KSS = 10 nM) and antibody‐target complexes elimination constant (kint = 0.52 day−1). The distribution of R0 was significantly associated with increased baseline concentrations of carcinoembryonic antigen, circulating vascular endothelial growth factor and the presence of extrahepatic metastases. Unbound target levels (R) significantly influenced both progression and death hazard functions. Increasing baseline target levels and/or clearance values led to decreased bevacizumab unbound concentrations, increased R levels and shortened PFS and OS, while increasing bevacizumab dose led to decreased R and longer survival.ConclusionThis study is the first to demonstrate the relationship between bevacizumab concentrations, target involvement and clinical efficacy by effectively mitigating potential sources of bias. Most of the target amount may be tumoural in mCRC. Future studies should provide a more in‐depth description of this relationship.