International responses addressing the under‐representation of older people in clinical research

Author:

Markham Susan C.1ORCID,McNab Justin2,O'Loughlin Kate1ORCID,Clemson Lindy1

Affiliation:

1. ARC‐Funded Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), Sydney School of Health Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Discipline of Behavioural and Social Sciences in Health, Sydney School of Health Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractOlder people (aged 65 years +) are under‐represented in clinical research across many disease areas. Such exclusions limit the generalisability of trial results and can lead to a gap in critical knowledge regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions in older age groups. International bodies and regulators have addressed this issue to varying degrees. The USA's Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has produced regular non‐binding guidance about the inclusion of older trial participants, while the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) binding regulations mean that those seeking research funding must include participants of all ages unless there are scientific or ethical reasons to exclude them. European regulations governing clinical trials of new medications require that participants represent the population groups that are likely to use the product being tested, while Britain highlights the need to improve trial participation of under‐served groups, which include older people. Australian clinical trial guidelines point to the potential problem of excluding some groups from research but do not specifically address older participants. While current international approaches may provide some improvements in trial representation, additional strategies are required to promote clinical research that better reflects populations seen in clinical practice. Australia could benefit from clinical trial guidance that highlights the specific issue of the under‐representation of older participants and outlines strategies to facilitate greater inclusion. This article provides an overview and critique of the current approaches to the inclusion of older people in clinical research and highlights policy gaps and limitations of current strategies.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Community and Home Care,General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Food and Drug Administration.Public workshop: Evaluating inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials: Workshop report;2018. Accessed February 1 2023.www.fda.gov/media/134754/download

2. MarkhamSC.Professional Ageism: The impact of ageism among research and healthcare professionals on older patients: A systematic review.2021. Master's Thesis The University of NSW Australia 2021. Accessed February 1 2023.https://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/entities/publication/55269675‐cb92‐4947‐8682‐9facd474a88e

3. Ageism in stroke rehabilitation studies

4. Factors Associated With Age Disparities Among Cancer Clinical Trial Participants

5. Attitudes to Ageing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3