Feasibility and acceptability of facilitated advance care planning in outpatient clinics: A qualitative study of health‐care professionals experience

Author:

Marshall Kate H.1,Riddiford‐Harland Diane L.2,Meller Anne E.3,Kruger Vanessa4,Kirsebom Marie5,Tran Michael6,Caplan Gideon A.78ORCID,Naganathan Vasi910ORCID,Cullen John910,Gonski Peter11,Zwar Nicholas12,O'Keeffe Julie‐Ann13,Krysinska Karolina14,Rhee Joel J.16

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine & Health, UNSW Academic General Practice Network University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

2. Graduate School of Medicine University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

3. Advance Care Planning Services Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

4. School of Medicine University of Notre Dame Sydney New South Wales Australia

5. Section of Caring Sciences, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences Uppsala University Uppsala Sweden

6. Faculty of Medicine & Health, School of Population Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

7. Prince of Wales Clinical School University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

8. Department of Geriatric Medicine Prince of Wales Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia

9. Faculty of Medicine and Health, Centre for Education and Research on Ageing, Concord Clinical School University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia

10. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation and General Hospital Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

11. Southcare Aged and Extended Community Care South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

12. Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia

13. Aged, Chronic Care and Rehabilitation Sydney Local Health District Sydney New South Wales Australia

14. Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, Faculty of Medicine & Health University of New South Wales Sydney New South Wales Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study sought to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a facilitated advance care planning (ACP) intervention implemented in outpatient clinics, as perceived by health‐care professionals (HCPs).MethodsData from seven focus groups (n = 27) and nine semi‐structured interviews with HCPs recruited as part of a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (RCT) were analysed using qualitative descriptive methodology. Components of the intervention included HCP education and training, tools to assist HCPs with patient selection, hardcopy information, and ACP documentation, and specialised nurse‐facilitators to support HCPs to complete ACP conversations and documentation with patients and caregivers.ResultsHealth‐care professionals working in tertiary outpatient clinics perceived the facilitated ACP intervention as feasible and acceptable. Health‐care professionals reported a high level of satisfaction with key elements of the intervention, including the specialised education and training, screening and assessment procedures and ongoing support from the nurse‐facilitators. Health‐care professionals reported this training and support increased their confidence and ACP knowledge, leading to more frequent ACP discussions with patients and their families. Health‐care professionals noted their ability to conduct ACP screening and assessment in clinic was impeded by large clinical caseloads and patient‐related factors (e.g., dementia diagnoses, and emotional distress). Additional barriers to ACP implementation identified by HCPs included poor collaboration, constrained time and clinical space, undefined roles and standardised recording procedures for HCPs.ConclusionsFacilitated ACP intervention in outpatient clinics is perceived by HCPs as feasible and acceptable. Addressing barriers and tailoring implementation strategies may improve the delivery of ACP as part of tertiary outpatient care.

Funder

Department of Health, New South Wales Government

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3