Abstract
ABSTRACTAmerican archaeology is rooted in the behaviors of our predecessors, yet our criticism of those forbearers is often disconnected from the issues of today's practice. Contributors to this volume seek to bridge that gap with a healthy dose of reflection. First, this introduction touches on some issues that are not more fully covered in the chapters that follow, specifically the #MeToo movement and field/conference safety, race, and class inequalities especially the costs of field schools and unpaid internships, and the need for inclusive practices for those who are differently abled. Then we summarize those issues that this volume does focus on, pointing out connections and interrelationships. Three major themes are explored: (1) how the identity of an archaeologist can impact their legacy; (2) how the careers of celebrated “big men” and “big projects” are often misrepresented; and (3) the relationship of archaeology to Black and Indigenous peoples, women, and other marginalized groups, including those who are archaeologists. To conclude, each editor presents a reflection of their own relationship to American archaeology and how that inspired this volume.
Reference44 articles.
1. SAA Repatriation Survey Analysis;Alonzi Elise.;The SAA Archaeological Record,2016
2. Bacow Lawrence.2021. “Steering Committee on Human Remains in Harvard Museum Collections.” Last Modified January 27 2021. Accessed March 23 2021.https://provost.harvard.edu/steering‐committee‐human‐remains‐university‐museum‐collections.
3. Beisaw April M.2007. “Osteoarchaeology of the Engelbert site: Evaluating Occupational Continuity through the Taphonomy of Human and Animal Remains.” PhD diss. Department of Anthropology State University of New York at Binghamton(AAT 3266785).