Trust in information mediates the relationship between political orientation and perceptions of the COVID‐19 pandemic

Author:

Dodd Bailey1ORCID,Rife Sean1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology Murray State University Murray Kentucky USA

Abstract

AbstractThe past few decades have experienced a decline in the use of traditional news sources as an increasing number of individuals rely on social media for information. Although this change has made it easier to obtain information, individuals often selectively expose themselves to information that confirms their beliefs. The current study examined if this pattern could explain political perceptions during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Based on past research, it would be expected that liberals and conservatives would hold differing views of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Republicans downplayed the pandemic and were more likely to consider it a hoax, while Democrats exaggerated the pandemic and were more likely to advocate for excessive measures. In this study, we collected two samples at different points during the pandemic in which we asked participants to indicate their political ideology, their perception of the COVID‐19 pandemic, and the sources of information that they trusted. Our results indicated that trust in information sources mediated the relationship between political ideology and perceptions of the pandemic, suggesting that the informational sources that an individual trusted was a factor in determining perceptions of the COVID‐19 pandemic.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference75 articles.

1. The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

2. Psychological correlates of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and preventive measures: Evidence from Turkey

3. Van Bavel J. J.(2020). In a pandemic political polarization could kill people.Washington Post.https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/03/23/coronavirus-polarization-political-exaggeration/

4. Beauchamp Z. &Animashaun C.(2020).New poll finds Fox News viewers think the coronavirus threat is exaggerated.Vox.https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2020/3/27/21195940/coronavirus-fox-news-poll-republicans-trump

5. Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3