Comparison of selected cytomorphological features of canine pemphigus foliaceus and superficial pyoderma

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundCytological detection of acantholytic keratinocytes (acantholytic cells [AC]) helps to identify canine pemphigus foliaceus (cPF) yet AC also occurs in superficial pyoderma (SP), the main differential diagnosis.Hypothesis/ObjectivesTo compare selected cytomorphological features of cPF and SP and to establish cytological diagnostic criteria that could differentiate cPF from SP.Animals40 and 51 client‐owned dogs with PF and SP, respectively.Materials and MethodsImpression smears from cPF (64), impetigo (40) and exfoliative superficial pyoderma (ESP) (17) samples were stained with Romanowsky stain, randomised, blinded and evaluated by two investigators independently. The entire sample was screened (×500 or ×1000 magnification) for round (AC1), boat (AC2) and raft AC, eosinophils and bacteria. Interobserver agreements were calculated.ResultsThe average number of the 10 highest ×500 fields for AC1 and AC2 was significantly higher in PF than SP (p < 0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis test). Rafts and eosinophils were more common in PF than SP (p < 0.0001; chi‐square test), while bacteria were rare in PF (5%; p < 0.0001; chi‐square test). Observations between the experienced and novice investigators were highly correlated. An ROC analysis identified five AC1/×500‐magnification field as a suitable cut‐off value for predicting PF diagnosis. This cut‐off value was tested by two additional investigators, who identified sensitivity of 84%–100%, specificity of 95%–97% and accuracy of 95%–96% for the diagnosis of cPF.Conclusions and Clinical RelevanceCriterion‐based impression smear cytological evaluation can provide strong evidence to support the clinical diagnosis. Acantholytic cell morphology varies in cPF and SP, and experience can improve accuracy in cytological differentiation.