Affiliation:
1. Department of Infertility and Sexual Medicine The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China
2. Department of Systems Medicine University of Rome Tor Vergata Rome Italy
3. Department of Urology Peking University Third Hospital Beijing China
4. Department of Reproductive Medicine Center Peking University Third Hospital Beijing People's Republic of China
5. Department of Health Statistics, Medical College Jinan University Guangzhou China
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe current cutoff values of intravaginal ejaculation latency time for diagnosing lifelong premature ejaculation do not always match clinical practice, and the inconsistency in the cutoff values of intravaginal ejaculation latency time among different definitions has also posed challenges to both clinical management and research of premature ejaculation.ObjectivesTo re‐evaluate the intravaginal ejaculation latency time and to find evidence‐based cut‐off values for diagnosing lifelong premature ejaculation that can be widely accepted and match clinical practice.Materials and methodsWe addressed the flaws of previous studies. Lifelong premature ejaculation was diagnosed based on both patient self‐report of premature ejaculation status and scores on the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool, with a control group consisting of non‐premature ejaculation individuals included for comparison. Utilizing receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the optimal self‐estimated cutoff value for intravaginal ejaculation latency time in diagnosing lifelong premature ejaculation was determined.ResultsA total of 307 heterosexual participants (mean age = 30.7 ± 6.4) were included, comprising 187 lifelong premature ejaculation patients (mean age = 28.0 ± 4.6) and 120 non‐premature ejaculation individuals (mean age = 35.0 ± 6.5). 2.7% of lifelong premature ejaculation patients experienced anteportal ejaculation. 59.9%, 92%, and 97.9% of lifelong premature ejaculation patients displayed intravaginal ejaculation latency times within 1, 2, and 3 min, respectively. The receiver‐operating characteristic curve's area under the curve was 0.996 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.991–1.000 (p < 0.0001). The perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time cut‐off at 3.5 (sensitivity = 97.9%, specificity = 99.2%) showed the highest Youden index compared with other options.DiscussionAlthough we found that 92.0% of lifelong premature ejaculation patients had a perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time within 2 min, a perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time cutoff value of less than 3.5 min for diagnosing lifelong premature ejaculation could encompass a larger proportion (97.9%) of patients seeking medical help for complaints of PE, and increasing the perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time cutoff value to 3.5 min would not significantly increase the false‐positive rate.ConclusionThe perceived intravaginal ejaculation latency time cutoff value for diagnosing lifelong premature ejaculation within a clinical practice context is 3.5 min.
Funder
China Scholarship Council