A scoping review of racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities in the outcomes of older adults with cancer

Author:

Gilmore Nikesha1ORCID,Grant Shakira J.2ORCID,Bethea Traci N.3,Schiaffino Melody K.4ORCID,Klepin Heidi D.5,Dale William6,Hardi Angela7,Mandelblatt Jeanne8,Mohile Supriya9,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Division of Supportive Care in Cancer University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA

2. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill North Carolina USA

3. Office of Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and the Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington DC USA

4. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

5. Department of Hematology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Wake Forest University Winston Salem North Carolina USA

6. Department of Supportive Care Medicine City of Hope Duarte California USA

7. Becker Medical Library Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis Missouri USA

8. Department of Oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center Georgetown University Washington DC USA

9. Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester New York USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionCancer health disparities are widespread. Nevertheless, the disparities in outcomes among diverse survivors of cancer ages 65 years and older (“older”) have not been systematically evaluated.MethodsWe conducted a scoping review of original research articles published between January 2016 and September 2023 and indexed in Medline (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL databases. We included studies evaluating racial, ethnic, socioeconomic disadvantaged, geographic, sexual and gender, and/or persons with disabilities disparities in treatment, survivorship, and mortality among older survivors of cancer. We excluded studies with no a priori aims related to a health disparity, review articles, conference proceedings, meeting abstracts, studies with unclear methodologies, and articles in which the disparity group was examined only as an analytic covariate. Two reviewers independently extracted data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analysis reporting guidelines.ResultsAfter searching and removing duplicates, 2573 unique citations remained and after screening 59 articles met the inclusion criteria. Many investigated more than one health disparity, and most focused on racial and ethnic (n = 44) or socioeconomic (n = 25) disparities; only 10 studies described geographic disparities, and none evaluated disparities in persons with disabilities or due to sexual and gender identity. Research investigating disparities in outcomes among diverse older survivors of cancer is increasing gradually—68% of eligible articles were published between 2020 and 2023. Most studies focused on the treatment phase of care (n = 28) and mortality (n = 26), with 16 examined disparities in survivorship, symptoms, or quality of life. Most research was descriptive and lacked analyses of potential underlying mechanisms contributing to the reported disparities.ConclusionLittle research has evaluated the effect of strategies to reduce health disparities among older patients with cancer. This lack of evidence perpetuates cancer inequities and leaves the cancer care system ill equipped to address the unique needs of the rapidly growing and increasingly diverse older adult cancer population.

Funder

National Institute on Aging

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Reference93 articles.

1. 2021 Profile of Older Americans.The administration for community living.2021.

2. HeW GoodkindD KowalP.An Aging World: 2015. United States Census.2016.

3. Future of Cancer Incidence in the United States: Burdens Upon an Aging, Changing Nation

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3