Validating a tool to measure spiritual beliefs, needs and resources in serious illness: The I‐SPIRIT

Author:

Steinhauser Karen E.12,Jeffreys Amy S.1,Perry Kathleen1ORCID,Parker Ryan P.1,Nieuwsma Jason13,Olsen Maren K.14,Johnson Kimberly S.56,Kirshner Miriam A.1,Majette Nadya1,King Heather A.12

Affiliation:

1. Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT) (CIN 13‐410) Veterans Affairs Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA

2. Department of Population Health Sciences Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

3. Department of Psychiatry Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

4. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Division of Biostatistics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

5. Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) Veterans Affairs Health Care System Durham North Carolina USA

6. Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics Duke University School of Medicine Durham North Carolina USA

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundSeriously ill patients rely on spiritual and existential beliefs to support coping and approach crucial treatment and healthcare decisions. Yet, we lack gold standard, validated approaches to gathering information on those spiritual beliefs. Therefore, we developed I‐SPIRIT, a spiritual needs and beliefs inventory for those with serious illness (IIR‐10‐050).MethodsIn prior work to develop measure content, we interviewed a total of 74 participants: 20 patients (veterans with Stage IV cancer, CHF, COPD, ESRD), 19 caregivers, 14 chaplains, 10 social workers, 12 nurses, and 5 physicians. Using directed content analyses, we identified over 50 attributes of spiritual experience comprising five domains: overall importance of spirituality; affiliations and practices; impact on decisions; spiritual needs; and spiritual resources. We then translated these attributes into individual items with Likert response scales.In the quantitative validation of I‐SPIRIT, we administered the instrument and a battery of comparison measures to 249 seriously ill veterans. The comparison measures captured general spiritual well‐being, religious coping, and emotional functioning. Convergent and discriminant validity was examined with the FACIT‐sp (faith, meaning, and purpose), BMMRS (religious/spirituality), POMS and PHQ‐8 (emotional function), and FACT‐G (quality of life). We administered the I‐SPIRIT a week later, for test–retest reliability.ResultsPsychometric analyses yielded a final I‐SPIRIT Tool including 30 items. Results demonstrated reliability and validity and yielded a tool with three main components: Spiritual Beliefs (seven items); Spiritual Needs (nine items); and Spiritual Resources (14 items). The Spiritual Beliefs items include key practices and affiliations, and impact of beliefs on healthcare. Higher levels of Spiritual Needs were associated with higher anxiety and depression.ConclusionThe I‐Spirit measures relevance of spirituality, spiritual needs and spiritual resources and demonstrates validity, reliability, and acceptability for patients with serious illness.

Funder

Health Services Research and Development

Publisher

Wiley

Reference26 articles.

1. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Palliative Care

2. Spirituality in Serious Illness and Health

3. Care. NCPfQP.Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care.2013.

4. Joint Commision: the source—evaluating your spiritual assessment process;Organizations JCoAoH;JCAHO,2005

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3